Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix queue bind MSI-X interrupt error

["Zhu, TaoX" <taox.zhu@intel.com>]

Hi Yigit, Ferruh

The original author was not found. The meaning of these bits is as follows:
ITR Index of the interrupt cause:
00b - ITR0 ; 01b - ITR1; 10b - ITR2; 11b - NoITR

I think the reason why the original author wrote this strange code is to highlight that these bits are important in this function,
he wanted to make it clear that he used ITR0 . I think it's possible, so I keep it.


BR,
Zhu, Tao


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 5:21 PM
> To: Zhu, TaoX <taox.zhu@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: fix queue bind MSI-X interrupt
> error
> 
> On 2/19/2020 10:17 AM, taox.zhu@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Zhu Tao <taox.zhu@intel.com>
> >
> > To bind a queue to an MSI-X interrupt, need to set some register.
> > The register consists of many parts, each of which has several bits;
> > therefore, the shift operator '<<' was used; so the operator '<' in
> > the code should be '<<'.
> >
> > Old code adds 1 on even MSI-X interrupt vector index used by queue,
> > resulting in interrupt mapping error.
> >
> > Fixes: 65dfc889d8 ("net/ice: support Rx queue interruption")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhu Tao <taox.zhu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c index 8e9369e0a..85ef83e92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> > @@ -2605,9 +2605,9 @@ __vsi_queues_bind_intr(struct ice_vsi *vsi,
> uint16_t msix_vect,
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nb_queue; i++) {
> >  		/*do actual bind*/
> >  		val = (msix_vect & QINT_RQCTL_MSIX_INDX_M) |
> > -		      (0 < QINT_RQCTL_ITR_INDX_S) |
> QINT_RQCTL_CAUSE_ENA_M;
> > +		      (0 << QINT_RQCTL_ITR_INDX_S) |
> QINT_RQCTL_CAUSE_ENA_M;
> >  		val_tx = (msix_vect & QINT_TQCTL_MSIX_INDX_M) |
> > -			 (0 < QINT_TQCTL_ITR_INDX_S) |
> QINT_TQCTL_CAUSE_ENA_M;
> > +			 (0 << QINT_TQCTL_ITR_INDX_S) |
> QINT_TQCTL_CAUSE_ENA_M;
> 
> Hi Tao,
> 
> Out of curiosity, what is the point of left shifting "0"?