From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64639A0526 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:27:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352F937B4; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:27:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BB22AB; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:27:16 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: R+pz5vlVHO2aFfuC2w2OmgEL90j9X74+HCE2kxReyWfYZGFojHSmUDB9l1VTOPqUX/2wHVGVWL rQBYHwYVUq9Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9800"; a="170048173" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,465,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="170048173" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2020 00:27:13 -0800 IronPort-SDR: ab/2aDi2KNxJUjqkTnJuDprjYhRAx1RNqupyaTaaFm4voDljk+xStwlleRXBgTsYpDogMQ/vqS zhqvCnbHaVPQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,465,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="541241437" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2020 00:27:13 -0800 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:27:12 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:27:10 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:27:10 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Di, ChenxuX" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Di, ChenxuX" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4] net/i40e: fix incorrect FDIR flex configuration Thread-Index: AQHWtzJL3GmpTuqTD0a1j/t8/wN776nBCAAw Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:27:10 +0000 Message-ID: <6068797ff6f14d54b8d5487c6a34d612@intel.com> References: <20201104082959.63800-1-chenxux.di@intel.com> <20201110070814.81465-1-chenxux.di@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201110070814.81465-1-chenxux.di@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.108.32.68] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] net/i40e: fix incorrect FDIR flex configuration X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" > -----Original Message----- > From: Chenxu Di > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 3:08 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z ; Di, ChenxuX ; > stable@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v4] net/i40e: fix incorrect FDIR flex configuration >=20 > The configuration of FDIR flex mask and flex pit should not be set during= flow > validate. It should be set when flow create. >=20 > Fixes: 6ced3dd72f5f ("net/i40e: support flexible payload parsing for FDIR= ") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >=20 > Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di > Tested-by: Zhou, Jun > Acked-by: Jeff Guo Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi