From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A25CA0C47 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AC74014F; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F54014F for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:58:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h14so27200682wrx.10 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=SEcQ5YXZQBlIjO390hQOpQbpHLTFcLBTlWgOWEtx90c=; b=Xd+BAD/Rjcp1zKK4dDSTZEbDO/oM/PJoeaSYvQszHjgwu+/lZ83vXLQuolIcJnEvAB Rph/dDt3Efm9C2r+vWGLHRTRr5tB03PSCU2UA+BrbUZhLY5WBcn4lrR5bJFWr8HqA1K4 4FfmfHr7NR3gNcs/9rdAYW9jsWKLYyZXEaoUF5hIOoLlxEQZY2aJte2ry2I6fU/ToZTo ITaqCcN/+oD3ZMzJdN8FkC7MtN/Qa1amf64tRDdBB3agMuJoLNza5HXXjiP4fwX/gcSb ZDZrFev1ZZtw2vCjzehA4xc9KJa4xgZ62LX+4/0knsMzA9E5mvHgXRwEqXaEQ9E/d39H pCig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ICT0gxiW7ZBFhMyNebyzcXZ3LA8kjjsfxHEkZGfMtrWhXrkmL bbdXIGQ6CVaMkuLGYjXSLyk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfrr1BZjNVNK/LKWG3+q6JO9kywswAezGkFy/xapY1QG7E+GWTnlKXE5emb7i+6mrjUdtrGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a49:: with SMTP id v9mr32883224wrs.4.1628614692550; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([137.220.125.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm24277100wrw.93.2021.08.10.09.58.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7416f78986ac6f39627befaab156114e96478ebb.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com, stable@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon , Xueming Li Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:58:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210810142442.727267-2-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> References: <20210810142442.727267-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <20210810142442.727267-2-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] 3-request-backport: explain why patches are selected X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 16:24 +0200, christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com wrote: > From: Christian Ehrhardt >=20 > In the past we had a few "hey why did you try in the first place". > Since this is done based on the DPDK managed tool ./devtools/git-log-fixe= s.sh > discussions improvements and changes need to happen there and not on the > mail that that asks for backports. > Therefore mention the tool that selected the initial patch list in the > DPDK LTS process to guide everyone there as needed. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt > --- > 3-request-backport | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >=20 > diff --git a/3-request-backport b/3-request-backport > index 67234d2..eafd31e 100755 > --- a/3-request-backport > +++ b/3-request-backport > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ cat << EOF > =20 > Hi commit authors (and maintainers), > =20 > +Despite being selected by the DPDK maintenance tool ./devtools/git-log-f= ixes.sh > I didn't apply following commits from DPDK main to $stable_branch > $(stable_or_lts) branch, as conflicts or build errors occur. Acked-by: Luca Boccassi --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi