From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FC4A0C48 for ; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:27:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD39641182; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:27:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E39340683; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:27:33 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10048"; a="232701772" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,249,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="232701772" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jul 2021 03:27:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,249,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="414553952" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2021 03:27:32 -0700 Received: from shsmsx602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 03:27:31 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:27:29 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.010; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 18:27:29 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Xu, Ting" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Wu, Jingjing" , "Xing, Beilei" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v1] net/ice: fix not clear bandwidth correctly when DCF close Thread-Index: AQHXeR8Lfz2QAAbycUKs9SVqcRW9B6tIjJtg Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 10:27:29 +0000 Message-ID: <885fef9173ee4080926ce139273493bd@intel.com> References: <20210715021642.17478-1-ting.xu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210715021642.17478-1-ting.xu@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1] net/ice: fix not clear bandwidth correctly when DCF close X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" > -----Original Message----- > From: Xu, Ting > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 10:17 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z ; Wu, Jingjing ; > Xing, Beilei ; Xu, Ting ; > stable@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v1] net/ice: fix not clear bandwidth correctly when DCF c= lose >=20 > When closing DCF, the bandwidth limit configured for VFs by DCF is not cl= eared > correctly. The configuration will still take effect when DCF starts again= , if VFs > are not re-allocated. This patch cleared VFs bandwidth limit when DCF clo= ses, > and DCF needs to re-configure bandwidth for VFs when it starts next time. >=20 > Fixes: 3a6bfc37eaf4 ("net/ice: support QoS config VF bandwidth in DCF") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org No need cc stable as in the same release >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ting Xu Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi