From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80CBA034F for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:00:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8B94003C; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:00:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E4E4003C for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:00:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x16so13266287wmk.3 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=HjJE9Mz72qQWaw1OZHUfGdCVKkuYOBasC2fPfZWrFt0=; b=Bt2fskaWdVUPvrr41OquSPYd/tYogKouqHyOgvoYScqS5Z8oyajA0x6r1rilwErIIt BX+qmcyONJD8zF502UO1gwgWZVHjX6nxiyku1WQQH0IDbY78AHfSwCs1LgkbuFPrEE2D ClK+419b1U5axTqe3mN3xoySm3oziHdCdpYvJbZfGw9aVDbFw1ZFZ2vlMDI9TeVJc2Yv 31r0iuqFZ1YxBgHZKsoW9skG4hxNUZIXdnbaW+0x84JfmvhvuDaie/rTMVKe207d8CKo 0voyph6wGvYTplt93P19bXkbAVNYYNjpcV7DBYR3YFx9jdNV7gJto/3qo9y9T5k2BcrR TWzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531YRCNfGkn8rktvVtNSBOvvE7Qc0nU2OLhjLzzTRSIpOMiyFX3o LsZcm9EbipFg8piUFSj8UQw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYYI6I4E83WNc7k86u/kvGc4bpur0p8LtUzLa8SBHeMQo2+AP9MhJCupmsQN9kzTF5pXjfzw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:20c7:: with SMTP id g190mr19687196wmg.156.1613995209127; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q20sm24750715wmc.14.2021.02.22.04.00.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:00:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9c674c5554cf054149be166c4094cdb02d018199.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Ferruh Yigit , dpdk stable Cc: Qi Zhang Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:00:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <89f42b1c-ba03-997c-4b27-5290db9fa1ff@intel.com> References: <20210205115222.1287558-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20210205115304.1287704-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <89f42b1c-ba03-997c-4b27-5290db9fa1ff@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] please help backporting some patches to stable release 20.11.1 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 08:59 +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/5/2021 11:53 AM, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi commit authors (and maintainers), > >=20 > > I didn't apply following commits from DPDK main to 20.11 > > stable branch, as conflicts or build errors occur. > >=20 > > Can authors check your patches in the following list and either: > > - Backport your patches to the 20.11 branch, or > > - Indicate that the patch should not be backported > >=20 > > Please do either of the above by 2021/02/19. > >=20 > >=20 > > Some notes on stable backports: > >=20 > > A backport should contain a reference to the DPDK main branch commit > > in it's commit message in the following fashion: > > [ upstream commit ] > >=20 > > For example: > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=3D18.11&id=3Dd90e6ae6f9= 36ecdc2fd3811ff9f26aec7f3c06eb > >=20 > > When sending the backported patch, please indicate the target branch in= the > > subject line, as we have multiple branches, for example: > > [PATCH 20.11] foo/bar: fix baz > >=20 > > With git format-patch, this can be achieved by appending the parameter: > > --subject-prefix=3D'PATCH 20.11' > >=20 > > Send the backported patch to "stable@dpdk.org" but not "dev@dpdk.org". > >=20 > > FYI, branch 20.11 is located at tree: > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable > >=20 > > Thanks. > >=20 > > Luca Boccassi > >=20 > > --- > > c86e930165 Lance Richardson net/bnxt: fix fallback mbuf allocation log= ic > > d5be7f9375 Qi Zhang net/ice/base: update add scheduler node co= unter > >=20 >=20 > Hi Luca, >=20 > Qi confirmed that a backport is not needed for the above ice driver, it c= an be=20 > skipped. >=20 > Possibly there will be a patch to stable tree for it, but it is not neede= d now. Great, thanks for confirming. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi