From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB63A0C3F for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:35:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3804068A; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4104068A for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f200.google.com ([209.85.160.200]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lxlng-0004f5-5c for stable@dpdk.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:35:24 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 100-20020aed206d0000b029024ea3acef5bso12236684qta.12 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:35:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=16UBy/XfIKx2HCQrbb1gru1768GQvh4sNrKT5hlZEnk=; b=ovzMq+TzFJ2ucoCt7QT2bTBDtLXZa6S9HE0UPF8EBDTBulVHyxSUx+DgKC93tqi+4A Q4jzn0lDEOTKxj4LkOnuBVKpHHKfpV+O9BMDqo6YL8DNLsRJQaIZcLTnECJIMv/t6EDr m5j7JDF58AJOn96jNC3YoCbt/PREXci0fMSqfNolFoXJKVUG70oNqpib7VOXZFffeh4E QnbofIAuA5kAnLqyycJ+KuvQxtEuD7Xtc08wzGtFIKcTlRxiRwLBsII0Y5KQMPkhXZpf kOMco3oK+znQHrSasQ8VK0PNhLVfSvp+aG+iMzpf3zbKCp47I70UvvV2U8QBEAm4oBfi Qnag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WCCPl1zPkBKuM9mdMqKVD0mLR4NwNi+Kv2D5X9ydWNCTllGAE 0oCFEjG873YwkQVjFs9n9J4ao5W8dnLJZxg8k0cbhHXX5YiokblYx+AbPmfjVUveHhyo8SlotdQ uymHCMQId+yodMBjg1lBUc4bvogzz50bA2BK5CFnS X-Received: by 2002:a37:9e05:: with SMTP id h5mr20823966qke.442.1624865723091; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:35:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz07nFdsGobb7SkJ4jtqEioX0vs4e+ZxsULhR8x2VhcpyVsj1EfoaZFMdGhWY+2bskwSlPy48ZRsP3YTpc3XWs= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9e05:: with SMTP id h5mr20823956qke.442.1624865722864; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:35:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: To: dpdk stable , Luca Boccassi , Kevin Traynor , Akhil Goyal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dpdk-stable] Why was "drivers/crypto: fix build with -fno-common" not picked for 19.11 stable back then? X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, there is an old patch [1] which back then was not considered/taken into 19.11 series. This is now breaking Clang build [2]. Since you were the Author/Maintainers back then I wanted to ask if there was a reason to not pick it? If it should be picked now and if there are any special things to consider for a backport? Chiming in/subscribing to the bug would also be appreciated. [1]: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/eef9e0412a84cddf8944379ed4995314b4369370 [2]: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733#c6 -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd