From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505CCA0A0F
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri,  7 May 2021 20:56:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A5F410FA;
	Fri,  7 May 2021 20:56:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-oi1-f179.google.com (mail-oi1-f179.google.com
 [209.85.167.179])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56CC4013F
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Fri,  7 May 2021 20:56:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f179.google.com with SMTP id z3so8394236oib.5
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Fri, 07 May 2021 11:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=agnaaii4N2VD4F0zGPg7nXPk6im9bGaxSspCaHh4Ut0=;
 b=AfVC/DrJpX3NeCoUL2Fb1YzQuw9ozRqZG5asXibsKgHkWQHslZPo6zOHFvLASjiVaN
 ZmBZnxEunOT9Lko1ajuXZBY1xWA5U3Qe2As9OKuiB0sDTyN2x0LytEV/UUXmFWM042re
 VIrw6+98EdTkRETSF7oXrJ+Xzi+wvDfyu/Mb0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=agnaaii4N2VD4F0zGPg7nXPk6im9bGaxSspCaHh4Ut0=;
 b=oEut53BGELsF87F70eTAbqkEWYIujpEcmLzNe3DvBtethAIHJ0zIUWaAv/pdjG45Lg
 +prVIlSX2eLrPqwkdBCk+n7IA9VTorkeYx5ip2m5p+UJVsTMokH2M7UQ+R6MKW3/bbvw
 zFRV0qBTXLaMJLguwh+TIgg/6AZ12vX4nQnZvWslKSdlh2rdD9N7Rx2lEyNlVesPNUDw
 7LQeTuz51DZfZWsq1BxlPnYLvXSLSMak9JI6+OQuQ/QopLZXLF8nq9lg/wyJv+ij//k3
 kX0fbtJU332Kkwc/7DcrGz15e0953YiBPAeS9Z1QVctYEm8l5nDaBfmy7lGAiANlK14b
 54yQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jJNqy2L48W9Kd04sN1JHk8ks8iF43poxwXzbEQaB2BVS+BAWl
 c09aDtbt0lg6OXlDqSrhjGEiZjdDgAjIZpIy/QMFtA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5x1aH8K46FjJaNDtbMToKLVweEcFn2AA+Cpma+2rd0CvNuqOAmdQr/7NxDTSMUQKd41KGmZwXmXOcpITnRGI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:211a:: with SMTP id 26mr8016231oiz.19.1620413759801;
 Fri, 07 May 2021 11:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210507181025.84012-1-lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
 <CADyeNECkwnsu6510b8cO2ALHMCNXuddJNr0fv+A8ytrFLtzsUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyeNECkwnsu6510b8cO2ALHMCNXuddJNr0fv+A8ytrFLtzsUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 14:55:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyeNEAeupRDf2S21w-oa0tpnud1O5QnSRm7DjsaQuC7TezOyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>, 
 Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
 Dmitry Malloy <dmitrym@microsoft.com>, 
 Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
 micalg=sha-256; boundary="00000000000090601a05c1c1fad2"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal: fix memory mapping for 32-bit targets
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Archived-At: <https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/CADyeNEAeupRDf2S21w-oa0tpnud1O5QnSRm7DjsaQuC7TezOyQ@mail.gmail.com/>
List-Archive: <https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/>

--00000000000090601a05c1c1fad2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> Windows compilation is failing in CI, apparently Windows doesn't
> understand "off_t".
>
> Should we add an "rte_off_t" definition for non-POSIX portability?

On second thought, it's probably better to simply use uint64_t.

--00000000000090601a05c1c1fad2--