From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBCBA04B1 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:36:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAFFA3; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:36:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3916DA3 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:36:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606156582; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rqP5FZk8A8N/+eEyIu90shh4wuPgC89Zf+rBI0fh4So=; b=hTIGYdVwDnZ1/USxBxRcW4aE6/LrkxqBrgwZ+BOlqfLCQuZSzbcWb/DXIw+Jmh/9JZruF8 UktMbCjDGCpk7mqg7XKyG9/o+rkI3EWW3tuSJMS9a+B2Mo5+sshM2kRLc3BJtrWtuZo5pK yqlmRLdhPXjuWRlCWYO6td8CnLqegVA= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-289-v2gZ7yHkMqy5nDIs-pSUMg-1; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:36:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: v2gZ7yHkMqy5nDIs-pSUMg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v8so3272014vso.10 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:36:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rqP5FZk8A8N/+eEyIu90shh4wuPgC89Zf+rBI0fh4So=; b=TtAeieOrAQVmXe+XaK0ydHjUxdQPHRqc0pioQmzfGUkXS7P3vB3ricDBbpJVa2Yuvj gQJTN3yXd0yOwczoZfvIa7/FHUXYQc93t9UOLN5XvxH9J8vcnCwndlgDL7jHlffAMqrU WQ8E0Hutjx2hPqPM2BHPOO3lORrRpfy+TnfgOARkn1ETLT226MPUybDhPtgMhUPXywcL iKGhgxrQ3IL1ExTlVopF0TCTOy/r0uczvauGMfna45jvDex6DuFP/zsCLZjlkCapMIPr JBAN+LElvxdvq9aLc7rQLAZTOdl5M0Br3widUY+fODUSFk2Rbnvqcm9cJWnrgtasqIvv BXRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FAHtND9zCoI6sfpRgkPSJ3IqGGT6WefpNeChEVAANJUXBwkU4 eDko/6IxJYgQNfxfJpsj0g6eKTGpcOh5qBLo6rIE1wLeiohq1W63nb8e862RegpJ6ojxXb5Gnk7 Z2SPmQjordm68kEly+y7QA6Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:4b6:: with SMTP id r22mr1252443vsa.10.1606156579407; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:36:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytSEZVlJXn2P6xvwN4Gb0W6KNn4HM8i7Ecckf3v+dTjP98rebjzAeS2FHlKh4F7Vra4T9nnrCluFDGU05zILo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:4b6:: with SMTP id r22mr1252425vsa.10.1606156579208; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:36:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201123171222.79398-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> <20201123171222.79398-25-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201123171222.79398-25-ktraynor@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:36:08 +0100 Message-ID: To: Kevin Traynor Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Bo Chen , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] patch 'app/testpmd: revert setting MTU explicitly after configure' has been queued to LTS release 18.11.11 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:13 PM Kevin Traynor wrote: > From 6326a29a056706db93e58067626eb2a3340a3a4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ferruh Yigit > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:03:54 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: revert setting MTU explicitly after configure > > [ upstream commit 56f0534311d4c61c63e2455169749ae440278122 ] > > Setting MTU after each 'rte_eth_dev_configure()' prevents using > "--max-pkt-len=N" parameter and "port config all max-pkt-len #" command > > This is breaking DTS scatter test case which is using > "--max-pkt-len=9000" testpmd parameter. > > Reverting workaround to recover the DTS testcase. > > Fixes: 1c21ee95cf52 ("app/testpmd: fix MTU after device configure") > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > Tested-by: Bo Chen No need for this backport if we skip the backport I just commented on. -- David Marchand