From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1442AA0350 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:17:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86231B94F; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:17:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036E81B94F for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:17:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593163048; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nf6doWk4Xfa6IaTlr2XoN2Nxr7YhLUkU+TIHpoGYm94=; b=Qd3DRBYrcCeQHA+olEDxSmxceep9D6p3gk36s7UAoNIyfYS0URV8b2c3kOMFTh7U73XLgV pMutlXuL2a/IWpihqspgcOSEnjNwCxa7KRIXkVHNJBzduy0OqYXGBTjQEpN0RowJqu4bPc 748u6AJFkZBTSVSGsAgSmuexK9DY/8w= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-269-neQ5xdtYOqeR5UuJ5PVLbQ-1; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 05:17:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: neQ5xdtYOqeR5UuJ5PVLbQ-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id y9so403593uar.4 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:17:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nf6doWk4Xfa6IaTlr2XoN2Nxr7YhLUkU+TIHpoGYm94=; b=r0BSewMWty8qR576M7HsEn46j5iKzfmFWvJlkSJWomb/W59qUcrqA5yU8KZG/aWhPx EPEVQLdDfVxH9I0kqyEFPoclkeKB8ax3H50sJISSJgKjBYAz/5UjULJSbB43HMa3rLNg wL6XKAk+8J42pyrD+sxKjD+t96Zc0uNq9wBmVC8AtmBYvwQ4kHtcsn3DSujHrzMLRYEt tYB7RZYXe9ORQ31z7gKXloqnwIksG/pDmLGYdmXHfsz9rF5lGXyUrOROBx5wRIORLO0K ERjQpLl64pkCIx57hdNe/oN33WnDzG0i24VuhIUSIm5bZEzxSxA4t/6PiMkz6SotUS/2 kfPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310p/T/rEQ7NgNMCEeBFmxxCUrZcQIIPy1NfrHqqSlc6g6Z+4qd D+8GD7nRZUMvltC647Enr+8esWSr3m0AFJe8205nNxuleQfkTIKv3AstuAXScvYg4CPt89YcvTn CpkQWZemkZtGxAwGaUbCnO+o= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fc6:: with SMTP id v189mr1677044vsv.198.1593163046238; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:17:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxsV4R/ysY3wpEnj0DoLHzwc+7Q9DnINzw12jBNMrgnomJQEEvj7Z+16RuATcVVM66VA2REoTlJpNxIddWe7hg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2fc6:: with SMTP id v189mr1677022vsv.198.1593163045963; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:17:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200621174035.6858-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com> <20200625035046.19820-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:17:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Wang, Haiyue" Cc: Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi , dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" , dpdk stable , Harman Kalra X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] bus/pci: fix VF bus error for memory access X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:34 PM Wang, Haiyue wrote: > > > I can see that some distros have already started backporting the fix > > > in kernel (fc31, fc32 and rhel7 at least for what I saw). > > > 18.11 and 19.11 will need this fix at some point. > > > I'll let you decide on the proper timing. > > > > > > > > > > It looks an important fix. I think it's worth having in 18.11.9. I will > > apply and create an 18.11.9-rc2 tomorrow, so if anyone hasn't started > > validation already, they can validate with it in. > > Alex post a fix in kernel just now. So looks like the DPDK patch is nice > to have, not a MUST. ;-) > > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/159310421505.27590.16617666489295503039.stgit@gimli.home/T/#u Yes, this has been discussed offlist and Alex proposed an adjustment on the CVE fix. But we still have to live with the situation where people will have only the first part of the fix. I am still for backporting this change to stable branches. -- David Marchand