From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C04A04C7 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:03:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0AB160; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:03:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFD8160 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:03:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600157005; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g2TdLg7XnTH+hZUmMmOu1qFdXhlHV4bQCJg0KYS7BSQ=; b=bP9BCtcZGv85Fh19KeBzweqot5EdF1jb5PxEJdPxZ7rOpDW9mMhbM5d6mSwASohzkXY6Us K61wyqjs14I+028tPWxQRhthRf4w2dueW7X1oma5MxwZD55t6zudzK0ILyDrsAs70pv5mJ nuI29w4ZMUczaWuwBnFqUEo1n0o29tk= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-537-tBfW0eCJOtqIRjV7WwKl9A-1; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:03:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tBfW0eCJOtqIRjV7WwKl9A-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id g5so915912vsg.14 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:03:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g2TdLg7XnTH+hZUmMmOu1qFdXhlHV4bQCJg0KYS7BSQ=; b=fxB9nNjFDPl1lW6lCwgfnoWFhquigLuqW6vLRa/b1wVb+VFmbp/7ldhh3+NW3bDk/F h0Es4n6TBGhGx/k1vihoseuW6bZd7AmG4t8FOb2A454D8i9jX8ECvPHQqtXsaZABQxnf lJxo7cyCbzVB4ZJxjkDuYCDsd8R48pGHx9OsuMbr9EAZE6dhzYSG/zoq8Nl9eyRG6fdX KaYlZJQvfdxphifNV1488WYX/FSbWkW6jQgE35XxcD0h1ts9rhRCM0mU/hQyqJ4i2Nj0 NAknyRsteykgzfzboQEV070TnTEJbmqtrqm5O5VBIUT04QoHJKeEYC1UxdHJhMHadJMg T/3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ePffnhbiRYvqoCMjzWWnLn4Q6XiLl2Wk8d96hEcC1b7iXosnd 6OyVy+sc1eEvnhKA0SFR7Ao4ToP/xQDb88+n0Ge0sj8UmIUIH2UCMC/h1dQXDrB+HYQNqvEOg6E ITNvK8FFsM0ADw9Ww5QfojpQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e190:: with SMTP id e16mr10163511vsl.5.1600157002829; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:03:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw//IP7ubDgGDnKC0Ud6uLWKZh3o4Js8GPXqjremakZZ6L/LOmhekumaijP0/FNp6TmoK00PHPi6HfGet3hBUU= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e190:: with SMTP id e16mr10163507vsl.5.1600157002639; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 01:03:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200616162705.83575-1-ting.xu@intel.com> <20200722021628.17194-1-ting.xu@intel.com> <9347f349-9334-5ffa-81c3-5f79253278af@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:03:11 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Xu, Ting" Cc: Kevin Traynor , "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , dev , dpdk stable , Luca Boccassi Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] lib/table: fix cache alignment issue X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:19 AM Xu, Ting wrote: > Sorry to bother you again. Since the next release is coming, and this patch is deferred for some time, I'd like to know that shall we continue to merge it? > > What is the key issue that blocks us? Thanks! Afaics, Kevin email did not get a reply, so I understand this as an implicit ack from the table maintainers. I will take this patch as is (i.e. with the request for backport) in rc1. -- David Marchand