From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D10A0C4A for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA16414A5; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C7406B4 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:03:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625652224; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kSnyWYkvQTJgAv1vhyc4rKo1RwVAMsgm0e/DkFtlad4=; b=Qj5xLIZ2vUcim7aTfL+xmxIgXr0RoJXpm69O0JnTvGf1PJV/MACMGrVCoRfdbFHDdPuXXx PxI05UYSVNIrGh8CmmUZGLLTkhGIFwBJJRDGOBzwH7Ub8uRhMRhMzVnU0RRH2da2x67DG/ 9WTARnCgEjoShbP11KUVFHNPJtEM/PE= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-435-C_yOxX9GPkK5rbazofvatA-1; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 06:03:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: C_yOxX9GPkK5rbazofvatA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id k65-20020ab043470000b029027cb996995fso673631uak.18 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 03:03:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kSnyWYkvQTJgAv1vhyc4rKo1RwVAMsgm0e/DkFtlad4=; b=ZUiSjdS+8Z6Fi4RWDDVlhcj5ex22cFQbgW3Kdofg+g5uLRXpzFRzrgNh/29IMM/yrv jgr+/xvtmw28Tl5UXnGWUX8RAGIa4WnfSGv2h8c5S+UZ+FXCTYO56mMZbxF/Hp9W6sly gLPP4zAXf47at0uTz7aSGfp166gCU0+3mkWFgvZOhrYRUkimGpWZJOjuAK3J7SoDVkbi oRIMaQYx64mSkwhWbimQyGe8jDQFkYdvcRQtZUdd28FGLjEpbtqRqruu0ffjYXGx31GU LfjksLQSWuaT6MuT9SRkwozQRxOyeje1pwguXobDrefJI9MbaiMAHPoLfp5kjV0CZ+aN MLJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532o0Nr+o09mvhhJLLOCfWNs5gSPgOatGCXiUITOz2PfDkRnn1Oa K8JH4i/r9bvUo3WdTtaJxvqAGuFifYUmZLbTqCb0Raj3fsY8Vb87ujAv21dbEIHPIeUdvHo0ouf GibxIA7f/wHGt7WFyx2VE6gE= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:211a:: with SMTP id d26mr21166832ual.41.1625652217235; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 03:03:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzo5t5wJb2KioZjGWdszEbKO8XUAtXmReqY0jj/wBtP97dfmi0ACOA3PESlAeDs7rUUVpeyFG20snJCB8Evpy4= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:211a:: with SMTP id d26mr21166812ual.41.1625652216985; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 03:03:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210706123726.12914-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <20210706123726.12914-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:03:25 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ivan Malov Cc: dev , dpdk stable , Andrew Rybchenko , Andy Moreton Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/sfc: fix outer match in MAE backend of RTE flow support X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:37 PM Ivan Malov wrote: > > The current code doesn't use match on invalid outer rule ID > in action rules of non-encap. flows. This is wrong and must > be fixed. Do that and explain correct behaviour in the code. > > Fixes: dadff137931c ("net/sfc: support encap flow items in transfer rules") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov > Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko > Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton Applied, thanks. -- David Marchand