From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1579A0A0E for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:25:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD034003E; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:25:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6D406A3 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:25:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620732355; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Gws/+06Q0q3xNKbsOvgsMwANbR0qd5S3QnJw0rB6u9o=; b=ejqeIFPnnBBq0PUjJPuJX1bCkC4+uJxI/pcHogFo497c55Shuahymr7OgZUUiXp2YDfHwx WNiDGCAOWUNbUNOiATHk2ciHJHU4XeebYBEKXdqv8DorUvz7040+HA+6lgVAPeib5VcOlZ kCTKDxk5pmBZAX9RdXbZgpQOruhxKz4= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-103-6rjM329UOTGcalq2j_29Zw-1; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:25:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6rjM329UOTGcalq2j_29Zw-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id i33-20020ab042240000b029020adb6e9ffcso805732uai.23 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 04:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Gws/+06Q0q3xNKbsOvgsMwANbR0qd5S3QnJw0rB6u9o=; b=idSpKiL5AoO/B+hnaMMuRnhBfuUPzXOCf2Md1UCDZO9f6dH9ns0J7xrueXEgmQX3TK 0jAelaedD9OxPOIvFF41cmUFCmQw2pboPmEGLrNusrf93S11JdROtm6w+dGw4vpMCtFA zwbOLFJseTzFq14ZhCP830KMQC+ONdJ+vmUFUYZAycKMqnnwJcPNei9/hKuStwPIUa/n 0yPfJC0fNvSr7yh99zveqNlOVrn/XkrMjTywQ1lox24ZUv18SkU8okK9EkuAtBLtWKY1 PJqkHgVAsdb51EnBBKbDIBBs+E5tfPzaXR5Z1Chm4n7vNfMvgzIshWteksWyg/j8bn4f Se2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EMAptG8AqNnBwo/VGkPfrMi5hdFjwpf7EYg1vXlhk/ulhq0AD Xl0nLpnetgiot1FOilzwatMJCGcMfyeYSHCxb+LyKu2pCrnrJObY1eZfyKoRnFQMgE9+GWgqjLQ 2W96iEvo1pLnXXqDqKv6t1xU= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6d9a:: with SMTP id m26mr24684799uah.53.1620732351986; Tue, 11 May 2021 04:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0GnxTWZxPuiSvWG6TnI0rHCpSczOWGmLXXdTD+GimwgwOSYzg4byWj7dv2k61buyh3bu8c9RxbsO8Q8JEVb4= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6d9a:: with SMTP id m26mr24684774uah.53.1620732351756; Tue, 11 May 2021 04:25:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210510224153.31477-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <28fcd67b8a84638963c830c1d28d93e36de7eae9.camel@debian.org> In-Reply-To: <28fcd67b8a84638963c830c1d28d93e36de7eae9.camel@debian.org> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 13:25:40 +0200 Message-ID: To: Luca Boccassi Cc: "Xueming(Steven) Li" , dpdk stable , Aaron Conole , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Thomas Monjalon , Kevin Traynor , Christian Ehrhardt Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] please help backporting some patches to stable release 20.11.2 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:36 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > I did the test, cherry-picking needed patches for the suggestions above. > > > > 87009585e2 - ci: hook to GitHub Actions (5 months ago) > > 443267090e - ci: enable v21 ABI checks (5 months ago) > > 9d620630ea - ci: fix package installation in GitHub Actions (5 months > > ago) > > 1e90d1b67b - ci: ignore APT update failure in GitHub Actions (3 months > > ago) > > 3cd7290c16 - ci: catch coredumps (10 weeks ago) ^^ > > aa9cb78f66 - doc: fix sphinx rtd theme import in GHA (6 weeks ago) > > > > > > https://github.com/david-marchand/dpdk/actions/runs/831111482 > > > > > > What do you think? > > Sounds like a great idea to me - but we also need the coredump stuff, > as these tests are ran as package builds too, where that is needed, not > only on Travis. I included in my test, all good then? -- David Marchand