From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: yasufum.o@gmail.com
Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
Yasufumi Ogawa <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 1/1] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:36:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xNqeX504WmvSjxCbsKG9=iuCiuKDmxqwJ2g4XhAybVOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724082031.45546-2-yasufum.o@gmail.com>
Some comments.
The title does not reflect the observed issue.
I understand that secondary processeses can't be started from a docker
container.
The patch title should reflect this.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20 AM <yasufum.o@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yasufumi Ogawa <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>
> In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its
> PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it
> does not work if secondary is run as app container because each of
> containerized secondary has PID 1. To reserve unique name, use hostname
> instead of PID because hostname is assigned as a short form of 64
> digits full container ID in docker.
>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
I don't think we want to backport this behavior change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasufumi Ogawa <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
> index 1f6a7c18f..356b304a8 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_memalloc.c
> @@ -1366,6 +1366,7 @@ secondary_msl_create_walk(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl,
> struct rte_memseg_list *primary_msl, *local_msl;
> char name[PATH_MAX];
> int msl_idx, ret;
> + char proc_id[33] = { 0 }; /* 32bytes is enough if using hostname */
This variable only makes sense in the if (getpid() == 1) branch,
please move it there, and see below comment about using gethostname().
>
> if (msl->external)
> return 0;
> @@ -1375,8 +1376,31 @@ secondary_msl_create_walk(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl,
> local_msl = &local_memsegs[msl_idx];
>
> /* create distinct fbarrays for each secondary */
> - snprintf(name, RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN, "%s_%i",
> - primary_msl->memseg_arr.name, getpid());
> + /* If run secondary in a container, the name of fbarray file should
> + * not be decided with pid because getpid() always returns 1.
> + * In docker, hostname is assigned as a short form of full container
> + * ID. So use hostname as unique ID among containers instead.
I understand this is how it works for docker.
Is this the same in other container environments?
> + */
> + if (getpid() == 1) {
> + FILE *hn_fp;
> + hn_fp = fopen("/etc/hostname", "r");
Why not use gethostname() ?
Plus, this api defines the maximum size of the hostname as HOST_NAME_MAX bytes.
> + if (hn_fp == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
> + "Cannot open '/etc/hostname' for secondary\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* with docker, /etc/hostname just has one entry of hostname */
> + if (fscanf(hn_fp, "%32s", proc_id) == EOF) {
> + fclose(hn_fp);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + fclose(hn_fp);
> + } else
> + sprintf(proc_id, "%d", (int)getpid());
> +
> + snprintf(name, RTE_FBARRAY_NAME_LEN, "%s_%s",
> + primary_msl->memseg_arr.name, proc_id);
>
> ret = rte_fbarray_init(&local_msl->memseg_arr, name,
> primary_msl->memseg_arr.len,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 1:59 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] " ogawa.yasufumi
2019-04-16 3:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 0/1] Get " ogawa.yasufumi
2019-04-16 3:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/1] fbarray: get " ogawa.yasufumi
2019-07-04 20:17 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-05 8:53 ` [dpdk-stable] " Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-09 10:22 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-09 10:24 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-09 10:26 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-11 9:37 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-11 9:43 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-11 10:31 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-11 10:31 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-11 10:53 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-11 11:57 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-11 13:14 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-12 2:22 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-07-22 1:06 ` Ogawa Yasufumi
2019-07-22 9:33 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-22 9:25 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-24 8:20 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-24 8:20 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-07-24 9:59 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-30 8:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-30 9:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-07-31 5:48 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-11 9:36 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-10-25 15:36 ` David Marchand
2019-10-25 19:54 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-26 16:15 ` David Marchand
2019-10-26 18:11 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-28 8:07 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 0/1] fbarray: fix duplicated fbarray file in secondary yasufum.o
2019-10-28 8:07 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-10-29 12:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-30 13:42 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-30 19:00 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-31 10:03 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-10-31 10:32 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-01 9:04 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-01 9:04 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-01 12:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-04 10:20 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-05 10:13 ` David Marchand
2019-11-05 11:31 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-05 11:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-11-06 10:37 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-08 3:19 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-11-13 21:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v7 0/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-13 21:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v7 1/1] " yasufum.o
2019-11-14 10:01 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 11:42 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-11-14 12:27 ` David Marchand
2019-11-26 19:40 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-11-27 10:26 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-11-14 12:55 ` David Marchand
2019-11-14 17:32 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2023-06-13 16:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] fbarray: get fbarrays from containerized secondary Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xNqeX504WmvSjxCbsKG9=iuCiuKDmxqwJ2g4XhAybVOg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yasufum.o@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).