patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, ktraynor@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org,
	 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	 Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix race on ports for telemetry commands
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:58:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xj5eOg0ePop=KRTjz3M968FbsPaW2rRhMx8Ra3DYZYVQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zv5n_avrcqbaN3fq@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 11:46 AM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:26:10PM +0200, Robin Jarry wrote:
> > David Marchand, Oct 02, 2024 at 21:18:
> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:09 PM Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > I was going to suggest adding a rte_spinlock_t* parameter to a new
> > > > telemetry register function that would need to be held while the
> > > > callback is invoked. Or if we want to keep doors open to other kinds of
> > > > lock, a wrapper callback.
> > >
> > > Well, as you had experimented this approach, we know this does not
> > > work: the ethdev lock is in dpdk shared memory which is not available
> > > yet at the time RTE_INIT() is called.
> > >
> > > A single callback is strange, I guess you mean pre/post callbacks then.
> >
> > It could be a single function that will wrap the callbacks. E.g.:
> >
> > static int
> > eth_dev_telemetry_with_lock(
> >    telemetry_cb fn, const char *cmd, const char *params, struct rte_tel_data *d)
> > {
> >    int ret;
> >    rte_spinlock_lock(rte_mcfg_ethdev_get_lock());
> >    ret = fn(cmd, params, d);
> >    rte_spinlock_unlock(rte_mcfg_ethdev_get_lock());
> >    return ret;
> > }
> >
> > RTE_INIT(ethdev_init_telemetry)
> > {
> >    ....
> >    rte_telemetry_register_cmd("/ethdev/stats", eth_dev_handle_port_stats,
> >            "Returns the common stats for a port. Parameters: int port_id",
> >            eth_dev_telemetry_with_lock);
> >    ....
> > }
> >
> > I'm not sure which solution is the uglier :D
> >
>
> I don't actually mind this latter solution, except that the order of the
> parameters should be reversed (and it breaks the ABI, unless we add a
> special new function for it) For me, the wrapper function should be the
> main callback, and the real (unwrapped) function the extra parameter to be
> called. That extra parameter to callbacks should just be a generic pointer,
> so it can be data or function that is passed around.
>
>         rte_telemetry_register_param_cmd(const char *cmd, telemetry_cb fn,
>                         void *param, const char *help)
>
> Or more specifically:
>
>
>     rte_telemetry_register_param_cmd("/ethdev/stats",
>             eth_dev_telemetry_with_lock, /* callback */
>             eth_dev_handle_port_stats,   /* parameter */
>             "Returns the common stats for a port. Parameters: int port_id");

Ok, this way seems nicer.
I'll let Robin submit a v2.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-03  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241002155709.2522273-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
2024-10-02 15:57 ` David Marchand
2024-10-02 16:27   ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-02 19:06     ` David Marchand
2024-10-02 19:09       ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-02 19:18         ` David Marchand
2024-10-02 19:26           ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-03  9:46             ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-03  9:58               ` David Marchand [this message]
2024-10-08  2:07   ` lihuisong (C)
2024-10-08  6:48     ` David Marchand
2024-10-03 11:24 ` [PATCH dpdk v2 2/2] ethdev: fix potential race in telemetry endpoints Robin Jarry
2024-10-03 11:39   ` Bruce Richardson
     [not found] ` <20241014193237.1992382-1-rjarry@redhat.com>
2024-10-14 19:32   ` [PATCH dpdk v3 " Robin Jarry
2024-10-14 20:01     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-15  8:02       ` David Marchand
2024-10-15  8:04         ` Robin Jarry
2024-10-15  8:38     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xj5eOg0ePop=KRTjz3M968FbsPaW2rRhMx8Ra3DYZYVQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).