From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872E0A04DD for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:55:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510359AFD; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605809AFD for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:55:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603371319; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IJ2pI5udihiIbfhYzTK5xhu72e6tuFQ9Ft6i3qhIq4M=; b=gkiFFnvuz+LBALqI1AixEpSL5A5NvGwp6EyKx2sQPsx+idUWq4vCfn2+Xa4fftVm1Ykb8f ghAZH6LuUTAMJnlJ/SnUur8tkfcMyw8rfl1r8pNC44abj5xzdbxlE+njPymD0M5XRErt6S /Yv84fDIZ8fmmz7JTCT6zzX7eztwf3o= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-113-56fkU3lCN4mWsAhOgYMxig-1; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:55:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 56fkU3lCN4mWsAhOgYMxig-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id z9so317375vso.2 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 05:55:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IJ2pI5udihiIbfhYzTK5xhu72e6tuFQ9Ft6i3qhIq4M=; b=hHcvudsTfirgN2Exq1qi9nAs4qAE25DIMesojLAuT9Jatjvm0t4L2NEU5DL396G9n7 2Fj1S5Qy7RTZtOT5j1Hr76O8MuBvdjl4oBAe2TIMzSqnNg1XnhgV1iI4Olrp1tBYEaQt tAh/IuNJ7oI+KJxD15MXex/xW7II8aUkfEaIuScRDaZgBhCWNF8y+uifShG2vSFxhcNc VH9bJRlTwcW/5k+r+CJeyYZqafbml9u99DM2KgPRRYkidRmE3Cky3Z88vEGnZgY9ZJkl v5++W0v/A5MWGIoRivtpLK4F10icGw9xdPOXUHVs6pqeHA0PpuBKOmXx4+BXpzjQ228k PBNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308KBzWma7xZqdFaqx6Ai8icwev2mp+U+6yDq9S+JysfxLGZWcR dkN93i9TXZM6+fjjy6+V/uqLi0W/OAU0qOdFTQzOTpe3mazrBsSsJ2tuXHuMZMIqtE/WQ28Uqjs rexe3WLGHn4EB4k9Vj8ZLoNk= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6091:: with SMTP id u139mr1339312vkb.17.1603371317832; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 05:55:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys/Xy5N4szyAYdP7xwZ1vlm/cuOD5O7rue10Ze3PXBRo8Ve0uvnnTq4D6Kq3xiZcARI/HqpzQt1JPQv/PDHbQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:6091:: with SMTP id u139mr1339295vkb.17.1603371317631; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 05:55:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7ec6b12bf0f9fcdb2306dec72390a853abdf2f56.1603207676.git.wangyunjian@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <7ec6b12bf0f9fcdb2306dec72390a853abdf2f56.1603207676.git.wangyunjian@huawei.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:55:06 +0200 Message-ID: To: wangyunjian Cc: dev , Jeff Guo , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "Lilijun (Jerry)" , xudingke , dpdk stable , Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] eal: fix a wrong returned value when callback exists X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 1:20 PM wangyunjian wrote: > > From: Yunjian Wang > > We should return an error value, when the callback is already exist. > > Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org Same question as for the previous patch, should we backport this? -- David Marchand