From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA96645612 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15A740A89; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACD140614 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:25:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1720787156; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aLNIPbgiDzSYambHlCMsKCwjBu6E3GKnFGG/h5nV5BA=; b=DBMfws6AUFXqcCpqtlBXGMY+j26RAoCz+1TY0BF56HPfGt+lAhIUA7EzZmexdnwuzHy/lI IdCDCvH1Uswo0frpQbL35DEqQsTxj8UotzIDka2IbXyS+V+gt5JWITf1IDqqiMWukFlg/A i0qKy10U32oKWa+j8hvXXYNlTiGCeoI= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-237-KQRXSen6Mpe8ih5jbT8yaQ-1; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 08:25:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: KQRXSen6Mpe8ih5jbT8yaQ-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ee8ceb0852so18356531fa.0 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:25:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720787152; x=1721391952; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aLNIPbgiDzSYambHlCMsKCwjBu6E3GKnFGG/h5nV5BA=; b=PkEhKfz/8mW4K1TYapUs/2NKMyrFKBJdnlW15rnklUQpmYcC3ymwxWRwmr16FYswB7 7eOk1ENY0/E+qdW6pzeeP8SD6wt2G1e6jOVXu4zovF1xUwAsp9FniFtWgu0xHNpIWygX T33sNMLssEX1RsZn4FZwrQCdx3FeR6Gs1RzQ04hkJ6FiwRjHJbREHYyWI22MvJQ7oXOo yDwCSFbyyE7EP96T9T1K0YomfxjkqsnCeNxz5nn6cU+OlXbqOS5aSOWx/Ew8hww3Nzw8 G/Itj4eHlF/v2YO2OPyySGgudBnIoMnjtDakne2O+v20SqpbJ1bGaZCKMK9xHtrOM7Yq H9Kw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXo25UOmvk8QLKf25H88UqYSCs8I0KaF/MRqiG8Y556h6wiAvc2AUF6rTHiGvXhyIqIfo5EuTnC3O253M3/kHM= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx/SjYFWsZoyHXwd+WqVaUqCmW6i406YpgmTFGaEXW5HM5jjmNb ip6AQDlkNziHQB6a/gmauBS2gv2a4wJbPUocHL9LH+kDBtbR0EIIYzmWP1bkv+LoES6PKRg/wlg APeSykFTqA+WFLsou8NALcEP04mGHcR17oVWVVowPzjfxA5GewUcCMowdMcM2Qxvd6iS3+4Camm 091+tMY4SePiBx21efdlg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:107c:b0:2ec:5699:5e6 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2eeb3102a6amr73789111fa.26.1720787152110; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHr+h2rgqGakhnAcHIE9edDCZZpH5E5F7w/rDWELUTHU0jrvUrl/pbaQ4RAQDGeE2I7ko86/rS5OzU+z8cG0LE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:107c:b0:2ec:5699:5e6 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2eeb3102a6amr73788981fa.26.1720787151728; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:25:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240708190941.120461-1-hernan.vargas@intel.com> <20240708190941.120461-2-hernan.vargas@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20240708190941.120461-2-hernan.vargas@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:25:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] drivers/baseband: fix device queues initialization To: Hernan Vargas Cc: dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, nicolas.chautru@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:14=E2=80=AFPM Hernan Vargas wrote: > > To prevent incorrect readings, initialize FFT and MLDTS queues to 0. All calls to bb drivers info_get are preceded with a: memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(dev_info)); dev->dev_ops->info_get(dev, &dev_info); So I don't really follow what this patch is trying to fix. Can you provide details? --=20 David Marchand