From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2ECA0598 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3679F1D453; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D221D442 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:17:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587485854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DlhcC3ZS6iC7MzDtUqPEw22yMrNPO/NlUWE4+AbxecE=; b=aRnC/SySW47zxuVfgKKBHVYjcjE615HPNyCRm3VLc+kYocjho4xTWdjqUNA+py4Nq+RCVz KdAXPZZROBjDNSTGm8zmgDgt3Lyu7nQTloUUJXytiRm3fpRHp5f/lehUcNMTISyiBqCRs9 xe6yWwI6J/vrLuZalfH+Dtao/C1kcaY= Received: from mail-ua1-f69.google.com (mail-ua1-f69.google.com [209.85.222.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-373-lUWuGOgINyKFf2IEtOTQjA-1; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: lUWuGOgINyKFf2IEtOTQjA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x6so2054644uaj.13 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DlhcC3ZS6iC7MzDtUqPEw22yMrNPO/NlUWE4+AbxecE=; b=JfmBfS4U6Wqk0jeI9NH6g+K+0WwjhUdsH4A+fUNN8pZO99sYCQtE/T7b7KDMr6hrzY 7tP7n6vx6S7llB0S908rkLjzHwle/2twQ2jJg2EmSmpNJm9R73LU+0/aoYt0YqwwUFqE tajW36BkI5DTp4A5fCkEzDw7wcQ27n41NWh1LMU5u2pg5+RdmvGVECqNr4rwNSFeujmR khWKYe9KDu0Hi8IywZ4wD6OTSfRAhNpux7gNDIQVV39fXLfRaRygVhFkgQSGN3isLgrl vZU7Tp97HtrqTmuJ1ZqsejIXKZzl1el27leGISQmMyJJPImMt96dzXwjTSpaGaxFXN40 d3+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaizjEgVLV65odCwg8B3zq5zY9Ms6TA1lDVPYvhOoqBlXLG3V91 T6hzr41tAujfZu9oC6d5W1sf7uz2UiPaG8D+w+FnB1gu4jpCoqzBd96RATsqkPmU/0EwB2n+l3s N9jmQznTzxfga4vuwJQ9UeBQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:382:: with SMTP id m2mr11496936vsq.141.1587485851372; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKrV09BeRBZE2ienaXDMUU7OPbd5bb1+sFUnxv5ky5z+2Bsm+Yh8q6Pa1WJT9t68nfajBq9EF+Vqomq0HLPxPs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:382:: with SMTP id m2mr11496908vsq.141.1587485851124; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200325001356.147049-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20200325001356.147049-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:17:20 +0200 Message-ID: <CAJFAV8ytJ=8G_ibytkcBNUjX5LWnY1DS41sgDYYxtuCGsqqT4Q@mail.gmail.com> To: Thinh Tran <thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>, David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] eal/ppc64: improve rte_rdtsc() with __ppc_get_timebase() X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/> List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>, <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:17 AM Thinh Tran <thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wro= te: > > __ppc_get_timebase() reads and returns the current value of the Time > Base Register. It's more efficient as it uses the processor=E2=80=99s t= ime > base facility directly > > the DPDK on FreeBSD currently is not supported on Powerpc64, it should > be safe to include the sys/platform/ppc.h > > > Signed-off-by: Thinh Tran <thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Applied, thanks. --=20 David Marchand