From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC3CA04DD for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:32:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573A8A938; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:32:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBF0A93E for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:32:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603355564; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FLOYbhUAXr/I8PTfrWpEWgryzHSPZb9GP1frHMdVN/w=; b=hL9QhIY0s2nq7dTPEc72dcPCT5iPVoGLF5xchdm352r/EONk03s6tIVVTI4CT0e4JK3CvH WGXZ9TnPLHVbH4kE6dMUvb7SjLWtSlk2EsyHqrSLAutoMDF4ljyq+i0QAFd43ulD3Aiyje bHcXif0kB4rKSq0giALKGY5KG+CfTiI= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-114-EReMdsZaOzmKJYqrhm-7Eg-1; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 04:32:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EReMdsZaOzmKJYqrhm-7Eg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id h184so198995vkh.3 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FLOYbhUAXr/I8PTfrWpEWgryzHSPZb9GP1frHMdVN/w=; b=j8bXwNn0Vb6NsE0eWWdOdVkRJYr9U7vnrRwxAAxFP6BdI56zHFFEEaP7ZJoBZUtKir sCea19mUIHErt85uXHUHPSJycrut+u6X9n7hkXc/TzveXBGttXMp1t0HPx+1v5XOtosj FZ1G3aKJppcKEDpuhFqNiVC0DmybipVEF0k73om6c2coCiNUOwcfJTteV26S+LFL3cuS Yby9rt+QBC6f9KizVxnVF+3DtDAhVol0X1dAzvaxi4dN76ca36hq2ubAH5dWTq47QDFo PRHUttK9ABNCHFTr5+FgCmpvidXJ1xxBIRv5Sv9SxYgMocRQBQh6geqBq0kBRi44uRWh 6M3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jm95101LV/0XBJVYDUBpZalKUo1UDJJ4Mp5+Kjv0HTHlZ4INk GBnstiVrEqtK5LUTV8/m3DsPdfGTIngaEe1P0zqU/Fs9BJ2nw8IhQ+Y5jTjL4FGVYGVEbBnj4yu x1kA1UBPfaS4wrpAS4E9wn9o= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f892:: with SMTP id h18mr232280vso.10.1603355561342; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyS6z3Czv0CawsizdIbNMQWWYFDA39uJmlFayj8XjxXhkHxMhvNi3Jtnxff779KPoNYPNVzbPP20+6EfgszQHk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f892:: with SMTP id h18mr232272vso.10.1603355561158; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:32:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201022080143.20371-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20201022082552.GE83@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201022082552.GE83@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:32:30 +0200 Message-ID: To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev , Thomas Monjalon , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc/guides: fix reference to x32 architecture X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:26 AM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst > > index 5fe7f63942..54dad08846 100644 > > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/design.rst > > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Per Architecture Sources > > The following config options can be used: > > > > * ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH`` is a string that contains the name of the architecture. > > -* ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_I686``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64_32`` or ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_PPC_64`` are defined only if we are building for those architectures. > > +* ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_I686``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_64``, ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86_X32`` or ``CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_PPC_64`` are defined only if we are building for those architectures. > > > > With make gone, I don't believe that there is an RTE_ARCH_X86_X32 now > either. As Thomas pointed offlist, this should go with Ciara series anyway. I'll drop this patch. -- David Marchand