From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736A44675C for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 23:04:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664F44113C; Thu, 15 May 2025 23:04:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BA9410F9 for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 23:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22e033a3a07so15385255ad.0 for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1747343043; x=1747947843; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9YosoUVA3AMXGmfrrIKB8zMOcWHxBkDHNoH7P64TDPI=; b=d7jWiAUEmXty4NgqeQ4vzucsowiNuIxUsjL8KPiB3ShciF6rJtTpunnHQwSWhZUqkh /xCcT6kvYN3ArjR3/6XyO218FloDRZDpq+WXX2zpdfk970GUCC5Zfex1j9kwB8PqiWAQ u0rdd/XA3rsmXChU+p1KDj+LfEmeXJlroLkxg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747343043; x=1747947843; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=9YosoUVA3AMXGmfrrIKB8zMOcWHxBkDHNoH7P64TDPI=; b=IpzYANFAe7MCwKfU7zpAMqo3wJIcIut2W4oizwHbsiRQToM7t5XA1aWQRT/ALrFXT0 UMMvE7Drf3yYcl8yCm7FFBUZPTSIGjZfezslmUFtKvLdAVVB8xWGJOYjqcKiMtvGJY0w 5o3ZyhOUTXc/wAYBx0GW/YdTL7qOQE/6Hjid0VcO2Ev68gRynx4E+GwvFQuGSOmEyukn 5gFowkmflOtgwwMuo24J6pXpLzWbKU2EJ9tNw0NOmNBdqs5z2bJ0zloUtnVwENn52dlS zBoAdgADauvHkhbo4v2bKhketDM4frxV9nWltZCYExVVzFoQjghyJKXIQhMWf3j/uBv/ Mhrw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX5HwtgAtMzGKdlY2E9pTBUVpMfObFvzATVqNxg6ho+S0yJbe2zVm55p/lyxVxuQJ7EBSSV9g0=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwXKmOiEaLwTEEXuDzfIEzRwsWKxIEnKgzBl/Nat9P7s4xr5LZJ Fm725k49JhK/I7tqXnObfNiWSfARVag+W/iA4EUnMJSnv6yEDk+Z+9+ooOjfsRfLuLGkoMKEXKk WxpHUiVBXUuo/XD+P7P55nVgT2Qtd51bZOzrr7SNnlQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuayaMXi1UHTZM7cpJQrpYT2a3olI0gyurMDKqhQE20HNnLOCXw0fo1fqjnr6q cxr6jALzsxw75v8SuBpp+LghhW6xRv82CcuowPjdqpcBPMA1oUN+mdSlgb5ZMnjzGMQCLH8dS84 Js/yjkWNl10HSPe5CSXXE3SN0t77fQorg5u0xXrOgEbmkqXidCWOwpJkhhfSEpigc6Hg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjzTf/UygCl9zynUrjTrQgoX5OpdQCx8tKKDK+yJg8LOmcXcsyWA5hWk9trmM03yXoN0rJReJx/gOg3JjEST0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1988:b0:22e:6cc6:cf77 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-231d45d938cmr10233375ad.53.1747343043491; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:04:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:59:20 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFufa7of8YsQyJeVT5xDFSPe3psdqfHxz-uIHzzIUdy05gzbQ7VFaTISA7A Message-ID: Subject: Re: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 To: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "stable@dpdk.org" , Doug Foster , nd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000688c6806353301df" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000688c6806353301df Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Wathsala, How can we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and 23.11 diffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some modifications based on what you had said to Doug? I'm not sure what the process looks like exactly for providing backports to LTS maintainers. On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage < wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM > > Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches. > I am > > trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 fo= r > this > > system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be addresse= d > or not > > for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 were > > released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I attached > the meson > > logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote > into this > > machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access. > > > > 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1703 > > 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1702 > > +doug > > neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although > -mtune/-mcpu > for grace is not available in that version. > Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring these > releases > on par with latest. > > > --000000000000688c6806353301df Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Wathsala,

How ca= n we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and 23.11 di= ffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some modifications based= on what you had said to Doug?

I'm not sure wh= at the process looks like exactly for providing backports to LTS maintainer= s.

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Wath= sala Wathawana Vithanage <= wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM=
> Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches= . I am
> trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 f= or this
> system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be add= ressed or not
> for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 we= re
> released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I att= ached the meson
> logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote= into this
> machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access.
>
> 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1703=
> 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1702=

+doug

neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although -mtun= e/-mcpu
for grace is not available in that version.
Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring these r= eleases
on par with latest.


--000000000000688c6806353301df--