From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17ECBA0547 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E064340040; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:26:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A7B40040 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:26:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618802792; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f5jcwVmPBf4B3OijbeT6DPX2twHZAFP+HhIUY6M14Ss=; b=YH1scjSzSNCiPp0+UdKxaIizjuSCBKOPVjNucwxVGPCpreQLbrnGFil0wybdpkI/kuag0J 8hRGPZHHKJ1/rhrDQ0J7vS/PpoJr4BjfCvOc1kzhjKPMszpfWFrFH6hej5kuwUYHL3mel8 9qfmlr5PSh8B3gHfsiYlbjPftAIMuyw= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-506-q3uf95caOta4FEGvDnqpwg-1; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 23:26:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: q3uf95caOta4FEGvDnqpwg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id s9-20020a5d51090000b02901028ea30da6so8276486wrt.7 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:26:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f5jcwVmPBf4B3OijbeT6DPX2twHZAFP+HhIUY6M14Ss=; b=P8QvoAAcybM9WwL1qpdWx/tD2+Uly3hxIu5b7wF7kFw0D21xqlVQ+tXTq6NZtkbaPG 3CaeorJRismwC8Y/l11yjwqvGmBAi/lCIVssBHzc6mGBAyuVZU9mgy+yABC89UO7WmWn +UY+/9WK/lRT0JqKs8oMDP9tVA9D85kj4bRoDO6RnpCkgDV8VxgfQTEdqvY+zwHCxzgI zle4U49sQdPdl7AopzAMXzCpjwGx8Rfl9O/imbPyKIS9pnym3F/dQTk/oAbiuSx27xkv Pq/s7qGb64uBdpfOdtbGPEglTTFHLQ37H1qnAL5cHh3qwK+VwC/1D1UMiVIATWdjTWaR jImw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+fiBFsVrkXGssdi2UpE93Z6f0PUk+j/QnYTTR8ZbMMpZY96KY UQVSCrb7JERYaSXN/JdzqBOupV9aKqUx1TsdLOsb7MctIuwnpk/bpSMR7uLppm/NBCXXMpdn6iR YY+DJsrKaVXgTXsbyFYVLJMg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3581:: with SMTP id p1mr3406467wmq.76.1618802782684; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:26:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8bL192XefvznDRq22Zz8ZDFSoXo6lfoyyaEAKsACD5acPwl1INy0IF+8YNZ20Ka1ccUqvjsrhSsVxVd+/KTs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3581:: with SMTP id p1mr3406433wmq.76.1618802782425; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:26:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210409074357.2499008-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20210409074357.2499008-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> From: Pei Zhang Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:26:11 +0800 Message-ID: To: Christian Ehrhardt Cc: stable@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, Abhishek Marathe , Akhil Goyal , Ali Alnubani , benjamin.walker@intel.com, David Christensen , hariprasad.govindharajan@intel.com, Hemant Agrawal , Ian Stokes , Jerin Jacob , John McNamara , Ju-Hyoung Lee , Kevin Traynor , Luca Boccassi , pingx.yu@intel.com, "xu, qian" , Raslan Darawsheh , Thomas Monjalon , yuan.peng@intel.com, "Chen, Zhaoyan" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pezhang@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] 19.11.8 patches review and test X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi Christian, The testing with dpdk 19.11.8-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. We tested below 16 scenarios and and all got PASS on RHEL8: (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS (3)Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS (4)PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS (5)PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS (6)PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS (7)Guest with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS (8)vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: qemu reconnect: PASS (9)vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: ovs reconnect: PASS (10)PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS (11)PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS (12)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS (13)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS (14)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS (15)Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS (16)Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS Versions: kernel 4.18 qemu 5.2 dpdk: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable # git log -1 commit 6a1b35022ca0dbdfa04cb7b8bfa5694c2fdda3bc (HEAD, tag: v19.11.8-rc1, origin/19.11) Author: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Thu Apr 8 16:55:20 2021 +0200 version: 19.11.8-rc1 Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt # git branch remotes/origin/19.11 NICs: X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G) Best regards, Pei On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 3:43 PM Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.8. > > The planned date for the final release is 16th April. > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > Note: > This is a special interim release not following the releases of recent > mainline (that was 19.11.7). Instead this addresses issues with >=19.11.6 > identified and discussed in: > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2021-March/029418.html > > Testing-Note: > The only changes this release has over the former one are about linking. > We switch back to how it was <=19.11.6 since it regressed some use-cases. > The most known one at the moment is building OVS 2.13 vs a DPDK that was > built with meson. It seems that make-based DPDK builds are unaffected. > Due to that this verification phase should not so much be about the usual > performance, functionality, ... (I'm happy if you run those, but they are > not strictly required). Instead the focus should mostly about buildability > via the various possible combinations that exist. > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.8-rc1 > > These patches are located at branch 19.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > Thanks. > > Christian Ehrhardt > > --- > Christian Ehrhardt (7): > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: prevent overlinking""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: improve static linking > flags""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: output drivers first for > static build""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build/pkg-config: move pkg-config file > creation""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "build: always link whole DPDK static > libraries""" > Revert "Revert "Revert "devtools: test static linkage with > pkg-config""" > Regenerate meson.build changes required due to reverts > >