From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D784C7D52 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:21:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id f24so11661421otl.5 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:21:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9Zb8lsRsLco09im7EjfHlHGYtRL041cwKYCQqP2cJE0=; b=bBEVZYOrJ539/RubYSgE/VoMGD0LdeB3LKcIuhXDAPPfd8Ocdevw4tk5YlGHeWF6r9 X4f81COjZYVX5V693epGH6kgYzHnLl3dddrqoKgl+FCQGxwOl8dHTUI3if331je9gbau qm4pbYw73btTdTS5XKg7sc7XvOC1xg6dOFJK7jAYOjBtZVngzAn9jAb6iQxhzmG/vZNT /NF0sMERawCUVfJk1HO0XcYBvOolGREgmyjb0IIkgEZFKS1pqcTG6j0p4VhaOlKhySFP i3rlmnX3DxLVH9GGwuuvEmc23h4Or+SsCcBaC5Nmc4GkI5JK65UOGVNwLhVdlvBLaYMX Pppw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9Zb8lsRsLco09im7EjfHlHGYtRL041cwKYCQqP2cJE0=; b=jHO+GjlP93sSpkzMA+6gg7mMbbkPl8ld9+0yj6XCtgJdQx+NgcV2ilCXYB4zysN7bw SVQqtzTWTC/Sy7nyPuO9bCjm7lL7h4vrUtDCUKzC4SIPyYpSTV+CT5GClPWG0nrqC/Db s3jc9nXhqcI0FD9PIkSQX7ZGlKUkYSTft0bzrCcSJAZ4sz9lyh29pf8eiW7/9z2hFE5X EV6C1chvEnLr+9/94yc2FWPvMi7/3SOXk+Uk3d+AFLBPCch0uZQ/215YR4W9CjIRbAfX WMwzaJzFkvh261PcKsXuKzlOf3eBfrwdtpeTZSs8LKQ0lEPMxRWpaFNlx/LS7fYVsiLP G6vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLVhM0H+PAyyV7euJw67ZZJz2q+cbI3QRl0Zt98FNdioyuezWKV tNP5VJEvBFdCdVFPGXX4h7yQhU4ECXAwKXBs/yI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5djMDXdKITG5Oc8ejinhn4QScWlWXQJRWN4dF1WK5VpE4kjetjCzyRGp8F9FAA2CBM8AyWLB5zjwavb+pUVvXU= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:754f:: with SMTP id b15mr4055652otl.231.1541071280132; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 04:21:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181018083737.16783-1-bluca@debian.org> <20181101111121.5570-1-bluca@debian.org> In-Reply-To: <20181101111121.5570-1-bluca@debian.org> From: yoursunny Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 07:21:09 -0400 Message-ID: To: Luca Boccassi Cc: Akhil Goyal , dpdk stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] please help backporting some patches to LTS release 16.11.9 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 11:21:21 -0000 Hi Luca I didn't manage to apply following commits from upstream to stable branch > 16.11: conflict happens. I'm wondering can the authors check the followin= g > list and backport those patches belong to you? > > FYI, branch 16.11 is located at tree: > git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable > > f49d7e9a9 Junxiao Shi cryptodev: fix pool element size for undefine= d > operation My commit is irrelevant to DPDK 16.11. I=E2=80=99m fixing a small bug intro= duced after DPDK gains asymmetric crypto feature. Back then DPDK does not support assymetric crypto. > Yours, Junxiao