From: "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Jie1X" <jie1x.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix testpmd doesn't show RSS hash offload
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 02:29:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB55343A454C3F34525ADCFDCE99129@DM4PR11MB5534.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210713170401.252445-1-jie1x.wang@intel.com>
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Jie1X <jie1x.wang@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 01:04
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru; Wang,
> Jie1X <jie1x.wang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: fix testpmd doesn't show RSS hash offload
>
> This patch reapply Rx/Tx offloads configuration for all ports after the program
> configuring the device port. When the program configures the ports, the default
> Rx/Tx offloads are modified in
> dev->data->dev_conf.
>
> So it is need to reapply Rx/Tx offloads configuration after dev_configure.
>
> Fixes: ce8d561418d4 ("app/testpmd: add port configuration settings")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Jie Wang <jie1x.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: copy "rx/txmode.offloads", instead of copying the entire struct "dev->data-
> >dev_conf.rx/txmode".
> ---
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> 1cdd3cdd12..dc9ce5330b 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -2475,6 +2475,11 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
> }
>
> if (port->need_reconfig > 0) {
> + const struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[pi];
> + struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf;
> + int k;
> +
> + dev_conf = &dev->data->dev_conf;
> port->need_reconfig = 0;
>
> if (flow_isolate_all) {
> @@ -2508,6 +2513,20 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
> port->need_reconfig = 1;
> return -1;
> }
> + /* Apply Rx offloads configuration */
> + for (k = 0; k < port->dev_info.max_rx_queues; k++) {
> + if (port->rx_conf[k].offloads !=
> + dev_conf->rxmode.offloads)
> + port->rx_conf[k].offloads =
> + dev_conf->rxmode.offloads;
> + }
I was suggesting something like:
if (dev_conf->rxmode.offloads != port->dev_conf->rxmode.offloads) {
port->dev_conf->rxmode.offloads = dev_conf->rxmode.offloads;
for (queues)
update offloads for each queue of this port
}
Not only check and change queue offload.
> + /* Apply Tx offloads configuration */
> + for (k = 0; k < port->dev_info.max_tx_queues; k++) {
> + if (port->tx_conf[k].offloads !=
> + dev_conf->txmode.offloads)
> + port->tx_conf[k].offloads =
> + dev_conf->txmode.offloads;
> + }
> }
> if (port->need_reconfig_queues > 0) {
> port->need_reconfig_queues = 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-15 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 15:57 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] " Jie Wang
2021-07-09 9:27 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-12 3:12 ` Li, Xiaoyun
[not found] ` <DM8PR11MB5639B19DACFB1B4F4E70ACA4D1149@DM8PR11MB5639.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-07-13 3:30 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-16 9:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-13 17:04 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Jie Wang
2021-07-15 2:29 ` Li, Xiaoyun [this message]
2021-07-15 2:40 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-15 11:33 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Jie Wang
2021-07-15 11:57 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " Jie Wang
2021-07-15 4:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-16 8:30 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-16 8:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
[not found] ` <DM8PR11MB5639C757A790F65CBFB647C2D1E19@DM8PR11MB5639.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-07-19 16:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-22 11:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-09 8:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-17 17:38 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " Jie Wang
[not found] ` <20210824171049.138208-1-jie1x.wang@intel.com>
2021-08-24 17:10 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 2/2] " Jie Wang
[not found] ` <20210824181929.142691-1-jie1x.wang@intel.com>
2021-08-24 18:19 ` Jie Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4PR11MB55343A454C3F34525ADCFDCE99129@DM4PR11MB5534.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jie1x.wang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).