patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"Wang, Jie1X" <jie1x.wang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd doesn't show RSS hash offload
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 03:12:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB55348B78DB09CB197D72CF0099159@DM4PR11MB5534.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <987e1c1b-a695-a8ce-1ee3-da87c9612415@oktetlabs.ru>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 17:27
> To: Wang, Jie1X <jie1x.wang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd doesn't show RSS
> hash offload
> 
> On 7/9/21 6:57 PM, Jie Wang wrote:
> > This patch reapply Rx/Tx offloads configuration for all ports after
> > the program configuring the device port. When the program configures
> > the ports, the default Rx/Tx offloads are modified.
> >
> > So it is need to reapply Rx/Tx offloads configuration before testpmd
> > showing offloads.
> >
> > Fixes: ce8d561418d4 ("app/testpmd: add port configuration settings")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jie Wang <jie1x.wang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> > 1cdd3cdd12..7089ae216d 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> > @@ -2475,6 +2475,9 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
> >  		}
> >
> >  		if (port->need_reconfig > 0) {
> > +			const struct rte_eth_dev *dev = &rte_eth_devices[pi];
> > +			int k;
> > +
> >  			port->need_reconfig = 0;
> >
> >  			if (flow_isolate_all) {
> > @@ -2508,6 +2511,18 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
> >  				port->need_reconfig = 1;
> >  				return -1;
> >  			}
> > +
> > +			/* Apply TxRx configuration for all ports */
> > +			port->dev_conf.txmode = dev->data-
> >dev_conf.txmode;
> > +			port->dev_conf.rxmode = dev->data-
> >dev_conf.rxmode;
> > +			/* Apply Rx offloads configuration */
> > +			for (k = 0; k < port->dev_info.max_rx_queues; k++)
> > +				port->rx_conf[k].offloads =
> > +					port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
> > +			/* Apply Tx offloads configuration */
> > +			for (k = 0; k < port->dev_info.max_tx_queues; k++)
> > +				port->tx_conf[k].offloads =
> > +					port->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
> 
> Does testpmd really require these copies? May be the right fix is to get rid of
> these copies at all and show actual information from data->dev_conf ?
> 
The "show" command cmd_rx_offload_get_configuration_parsed() actually should only touch port->dev_conf.
And It doesn't only show dev_conf, but also per queue rx_conf. It's impossible to show per queue rx conf info from data->dev_conf.

The copy is already done in init_config actually. But by then, dev->data->dev_conf doesn't include RSS_HASH.
RSS_HASH is added by driver in dev_configure. That's why this patch wants to copy again after dev_configure I guess.

But this patch is INCORRECT anyway.
Because any cmd that changes port offload will change port->dev_conf and port->rx/tx_conf NOT dev->data->dev_conf.
So after this patch, if a user " port config 0 rx_offload xxx on", all of the new config will disappear.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12  3:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-09 15:57 [dpdk-stable] " Jie Wang
2021-07-09  9:27 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-12  3:12   ` Li, Xiaoyun [this message]
     [not found]     ` <DM8PR11MB5639B19DACFB1B4F4E70ACA4D1149@DM8PR11MB5639.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-07-13  3:30       ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-16  9:09     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-13 17:04 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Jie Wang
2021-07-15  2:29   ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-15  2:40     ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-15 11:33   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Jie Wang
2021-07-15 11:57     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " Jie Wang
2021-07-15  4:53       ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-16  8:30         ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-07-16  8:52           ` Ferruh Yigit
     [not found]             ` <DM8PR11MB5639C757A790F65CBFB647C2D1E19@DM8PR11MB5639.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-07-19 16:18               ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-22 11:03                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-09  8:53                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-17 17:38       ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " Jie Wang
     [not found]         ` <20210824171049.138208-1-jie1x.wang@intel.com>
2021-08-24 17:10           ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v6 2/2] " Jie Wang
     [not found]         ` <20210824181929.142691-1-jie1x.wang@intel.com>
2021-08-24 18:19           ` Jie Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4PR11MB55348B78DB09CB197D72CF0099159@DM4PR11MB5534.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jie1x.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).