From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru" <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>,
"ying.a.wang@intel.com" <ying.a.wang@intel.com>,
"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Shiri Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:14:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB274857DEB4A438DFA69AD634CF4F9@DM6PR12MB2748.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536631b9-c634-ddac-c154-91978ffc29a5@intel.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:10 PM
> To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> <orika@nvidia.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru; ying.a.wang@intel.com;
> olivier.matz@6wind.com; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Shiri
> Kuzin <shirik@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org; David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: update qfi definition
>
> On 4/4/2021 8:45 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for
> > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI
> > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi
> > (QoS Flow Identifier) based on RFC 38415-g30
> >
> > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi
> > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field.
> >
> > note: changing the default mask would cause different
> > patterns generated by testpmd.
> >
> > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API")
> > Cc: ying.a.wang@intel.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++-
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and
> their attributes, if any.
> > - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> >
> > - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type.
> > - - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier.
> > +
> > + - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier.
> >
> > - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header.
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index 6cc57136ac..20b4389429 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <rte_arp.h>
> > #include <rte_common.h>
> > #include <rte_ether.h>
> > +#include <rte_gtp.h>
> > #include <rte_icmp.h>
> > #include <rte_ip.h>
> > #include <rte_sctp.h>
> > @@ -1421,16 +1422,29 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta
> rte_flow_item_meta_mask = {
> > *
> > * Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
> > */
> > +RTE_STD_C11
> > struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc {
> > - uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > - uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> > + union {
> > + struct {
> > + /*
> > + * These fields are retained for compatibility.
> > + * Please switch to the new header field below.
> > + */
> > + uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */
> > + uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
> > +
> > + };
> > + struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr hdr;
> > + };
> > };
>
> This will change the struct size even with union, since old version is missing
> all fields from protocol header. Struct size will go from 2 --> 5 bytes [1].
>
> Since this is public struct, we can't change its size.
>
> @Ori, Andrew,
>
> Do you have a suggestion for next step?
>
> - We can still add the "struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr", and add a deprecation notice
> for "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc" to say it will use "struct
> rte_gtp_psc_hdr"
> on 21.11.
>
> - And for this release use the Raslan's first version:
> - uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */
> + uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */
>
>
> Does it make sense? Any comments?
>
@Ori Kam, @andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
This is a kind remainder of this patch,
>
>
> [1]
> struct rte_gtp_psc_hdr {
> uint8_t ext_hdr_len; /* 0 1 */
> uint8_t type:4; /* 1: 0 1 */
> uint8_t qmp:1; /* 1: 4 1 */
>
> /* XXX 3 bits hole, try to pack */
>
> union {
> struct {
> uint8_t snp:1; /* 2: 0 1 */
> uint8_t spare_dl1:2; /* 2: 1 1 */
> }; /* 2 1 */
> struct {
> uint8_t dl_delay_ind:1; /* 2: 0 1 */
> uint8_t ul_delay_ind:1; /* 2: 1 1 */
> uint8_t snp_ul1:1; /* 2: 2 1 */
> }; /* 2 1 */
> }; /* 2 1 */
> union {
> struct {
> uint8_t ppp:1; /* 3: 0 1 */
> uint8_t rqi:1; /* 3: 1 1 */
> }; /* 3 1 */
> struct {
> uint8_t n_delay_ind:1; /* 3: 0 1 */
> uint8_t spare_ul2:1; /* 3: 1 1 */
> }; /* 3 1 */
> }; /* 3 1 */
> uint8_t qfi:6; /* 4: 0 1 */
>
> /* XXX 2 bits hole, try to pack */
>
> uint8_t data[]; /* 5 0 */
>
> /* size: 5, cachelines: 1, members: 7 */
> /* sum members: 3 */
> /* sum bitfield members: 11 bits, bit holes: 2, sum bit holes: 5 bits */
> /* last cacheline: 5 bytes */
> };
>
> >
> > /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC. */
> > #ifndef __cplusplus
> > static const struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc
> > rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask = {
> > - .qfi = 0x3f,
> > + .hdr.ppp = 1,
> > + .hdr.rqi = 1,
> > + .hdr.qfi = 0x3f,
> > };
> > #endif
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210330075036.6579-2-rasland@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <20210330080013.6922-1-rasland@nvidia.com>
2021-03-30 8:00 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 " Raslan Darawsheh
2021-04-01 16:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-04 7:18 ` Raslan Darawsheh
[not found] ` <20210404074552.24190-1-rasland@nvidia.com>
2021-04-04 7:45 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 " Raslan Darawsheh
2021-04-06 16:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-13 8:14 ` Raslan Darawsheh [this message]
2021-04-13 9:24 ` Ori Kam
2021-04-14 12:16 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-15 6:33 ` Raslan Darawsheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR12MB274857DEB4A438DFA69AD634CF4F9@DM6PR12MB2748.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=shirik@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=ying.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).