patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
To: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Sun, Chenmin" <chenmin.sun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix flex payload rule conflict issue
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 02:36:30 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB38074728F517CDD773DEFFB2F7D10@MN2PR11MB3807.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6828c56a8f01400c9cea311be2a6679d@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 2:07 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Sun, Chenmin <chenmin.sun@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix flex payload rule conflict issue
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 1, 2021 12:04 PM
> > To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Sun,
> > Chenmin <chenmin.sun@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix flex payload rule conflict issue
> >
> > From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> >
> > With the following commands, the second flow can't be created successfully.
> >
> > 1. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp /
> >    raw relative is 1 pattern is 0102030405 / end
> >    actions drop / end
> > 2. flow destroy 0 rule 0
> > 3. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp /
> >    raw relative is 1 pattern is 010203040506 / end
> >    actions drop / end
> >
> > The root cause is that a flag for flex pit isn't reset.
> >
> > Fixes: 6ced3dd72f5f ("net/i40e: support flexible payload parsing for
> > FDIR")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Reported-by: Chenmin Sun<chenmin.sun@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v3 changes:
> >  - Add flow count for flexible payload flow.
> > v2 changeds:
> >  - Add fix line.
> >
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h |  3 +++
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c   | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c   |  4 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h index 696c5aaf7e..aac226999c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > @@ -636,6 +636,7 @@ struct i40e_fdir_flow_ext {  bool is_udp; /*
> > ipv4|ipv6 udp flow */  enum i40e_flxpld_layer_idx layer_idx;  struct
> > i40e_fdir_flex_pit flex_pit[I40E_MAX_FLXPLD_LAYER *
> > I40E_MAX_FLXPLD_FIED];
> > +bool is_flex_flow;
> >  };
> >
> >  /* A structure used to define the input for a flow director filter
> > entry */ @@
> > -784,6 +785,8 @@ struct i40e_fdir_info {  bool
> > flex_mask_flag[I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_MAX];
> >
> >  bool inset_flag[I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_MAX]; /* Mark if input set is set
> > */
> > +
> > +uint32_t flex_flow_count[I40E_MAX_FLXPLD_LAYER];
> >  };
> >
> >  /* Ethertype filter number HW supports */ diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c index
> > 50c0eee9f2..4400b607c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c
> > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ i40e_init_flx_pld(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> > I40E_PRTQF_FLX_PIT(index + 1), 0x0000FC29);/*non- used*/
> > I40E_WRITE_REG(hw,  I40E_PRTQF_FLX_PIT(index + 2), 0x0000FC2A);/*non-
> > used*/
> > +pf->fdir.flex_pit_flag[i] = 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  /* initialize the masks */
> > @@ -1513,8 +1514,6 @@ i40e_flow_set_fdir_flex_pit(struct i40e_pf *pf,
> > I40E_WRITE_REG(hw, I40E_PRTQF_FLX_PIT(field_idx), flx_pit);
> > min_next_off++;  }
> > -
> > -pf->fdir.flex_pit_flag[layer_idx] = 1;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int
> > @@ -1738,6 +1737,8 @@ i40e_flow_add_del_fdir_filter(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev,  fdir_info->fdir_guarantee_free_space > 0)  wait_status = false;
> > } else {
> > +layer_idx = filter->input.flow_ext.layer_idx;
> > +
> 
> Assume that flow_ext.layer_idx should be assign to the layer_idx at the
> condition of " (!filter->input.flow_ext.customized_pctype) ", right?

Yes, thanks for the comment, will fix in next version.

> 
> >  node = i40e_sw_fdir_filter_lookup(fdir_info,
> >  &check_filter.fdir.input);
> >  if (!node) {
> > @@ -1785,6 +1786,17 @@ i40e_flow_add_del_fdir_filter(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,  goto error_op;  }
> >
> > +if (filter->input.flow_ext.is_flex_flow) { if (add) {
> > +fdir_info->flex_flow_count[layer_idx]++;
> > +pf->fdir.flex_pit_flag[layer_idx] = 1;
> > +} else {
> > +fdir_info->flex_flow_count[layer_idx]--;
> > +if (!fdir_info->flex_flow_count[layer_idx])
> > +pf->fdir.flex_pit_flag[layer_idx] = 0;
> > +}
> > +}
> > +
> >  if (add) {
> >  fdir_info->fdir_actual_cnt++;
> >  if (fdir_info->fdir_invalprio == 1 && diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c index
> > b09ff6590d..bbd666b7a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > @@ -3069,6 +3069,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev,
> >         &flex_pit, sizeof(struct i40e_fdir_flex_pit));
> > filter->input.flow_ext.layer_idx = layer_idx;
> > filter->input.flow_ext.raw_id = raw_id;
> > +filter->input.flow_ext.is_flex_flow = true;
> >  break;
> >  case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VF:
> >  vf_spec = item->spec;
> > @@ -5515,6 +5516,9 @@ i40e_flow_flush_fdir_filter(struct i40e_pf *pf)
> > pf->fdir.flex_mask_flag[pctype] = 0;  }
> >
> > +for (i = 0; i < I40E_MAX_FLXPLD_LAYER; i++)
> > +pf->fdir.flex_pit_flag[i] = 0;
> > +
> >  /* Disable FDIR processing as all FDIR rules are now flushed */
> > i40e_fdir_rx_proc_enable(dev, 0);  }
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-05  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201229054639.92132-1-beilei.xing@intel.com>
2020-12-29  6:17 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " beilei.xing
2020-12-28  7:15   ` Guo, Jia
2021-01-01  4:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " beilei.xing
2020-12-31  6:07   ` Guo, Jia
2021-01-05  2:36     ` Xing, Beilei [this message]
2021-01-05  3:12 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " beilei.xing
2021-01-05  3:39   ` Guo, Jia
2021-01-05 12:33     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-01-06  2:51 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] " beilei.xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR11MB38074728F517CDD773DEFFB2F7D10@MN2PR11MB3807.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=chenmin.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

patches for DPDK stable branches

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \
		stable@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index stable

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git