From: Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>, dwilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>, Sitong Liu <siliu@redhat.com>,
Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>,
"qian.q.xu@intel.com" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"benjamin.walker@intel.com" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"Adrian Vladu (Cloudbase Solutions SRL)" <v-advlad@microsoft.com>,
Luca Boccassi <Luca.Boccassi@microsoft.com>,
Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] 18.11.2 (LTS) patches review and test
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 22:32:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW2PR2101MB09863CF6A260C5F8F2F49139DA180@MW2PR2101MB0986.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22bc3895-134f-9ee9-f211-5861bfeb795b@redhat.com>
Hello,
(Sorry for late response, we should fix the automation issue before sending out the result. This is test result of http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/snapshot/dpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz)
DPDK https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958301676&sdata=moKSeRiVoqwg0x6gESsSzYjrX6BGYunR8pM6XIQj7lA%3D&reserved=0, was validated on Azure for Canonical UbuntuServer 16.04-LTS latest, Canonical UbuntuServer 18.04-DAILY-LTS latest, RedHat RHEL 7-RAW latest, RedHat RHEL 7.5 latest, Openlogic CentOS 7.5 latest, SUSE SLES 15 latest.
Tested with Mellanox and netvsc poll-mode drivers.
The tests were executed using LISAv2 framework (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FLIS%2FLISAv2&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958301676&sdata=8Ql%2FeIuU230b1RE89fy9JCdXFDx6s3%2BNZEgIWH%2BinCg%3D&reserved=0).
Test case description:
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE - verifies kernel is supported and that the build is successful
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST - verifies using testpmd that packets can be sent from a VM to another VM
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS - builds OVS with DPDK support and tests if the OVS DPDK ports can be created (only on Ubuntu)
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK - disables/enables Accelerated Networking for the NICs under test and makes sure DPDK works in both scenarios
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC - disables/enables Accelerated Networking for the NICs while generating traffic using testpmd
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15 - verifies DPDK forwarding performance using testpmd on 2, 4, 8 cores, rx and io mode on size Standard_DS15_v2
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4 - verifies DPDK performance using testpmd on 1 core, rx and io mode on size Standard_DS4_v2
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15 - verifies DPDK performance using testpmd on 1 core, rx and io mode on size Standard_DS15_v2
* PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-DS15 - verifies DPDK performance using testpmd on 2, 4, 8 cores, rx and io mode on size Standard_DS15_v2
* PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32 - verifies DPDK performance using testpmd on 2, 4, 8, 16 cores, rx and io mode on size Standard_F32s_v2
* DPDK-RING-LATENCY - verifies DPDK CPU latency using https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fshemminger%2Fdpdk-ring-ping.git&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958301676&sdata=GZlkGkRZoNpVJYegaKY1ILBarjJj%2BeCc1Yv%2BcJ4Ysng%3D&reserved=0
DPDK job exited with status: UNSTABLE - https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinuxpipeline.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%2Fjob%2Fpipeline-dpdk-validation%2Fjob%2Fmaster%2F73%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958301676&sdata=8ocjqXbVj5S4LbehCorNTA%2BLh6Wcvkcg%2BM4WiuOYDUs%3D&reserved=0.
Test results for DPDK 'https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958301676&sdata=moKSeRiVoqwg0x6gESsSzYjrX6BGYunR8pM6XIQj7lA%3D&reserved=0' and Azure image: 'Canonical UbuntuServer 16.04-LTS latest':
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: ABORTED
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: PASSED
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC: ABORTED
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY: PASSED
Test results for DPDK 'https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958301676&sdata=moKSeRiVoqwg0x6gESsSzYjrX6BGYunR8pM6XIQj7lA%3D&reserved=0' and Azure image: 'Canonical UbuntuServer 18.04-DAILY-LTS latest':
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: ABORTED
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: PASSED
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY: PASSED
Test results for DPDK 'https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958311665&sdata=lCDzrPrhl0whSSU4NPpSOOHZ5rORWFVOrGCs0JdIHIY%3D&reserved=0' and Azure image: 'RedHat RHEL 7-RAW latest':
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: SKIPPED
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: ABORTED
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY: PASSED
Test results for DPDK 'https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958311665&sdata=lCDzrPrhl0whSSU4NPpSOOHZ5rORWFVOrGCs0JdIHIY%3D&reserved=0' and Azure image: 'RedHat RHEL 7.5 latest':
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: FAILED
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: SKIPPED
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: PASSED
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC: ABORTED
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY: PASSED
Test results for DPDK 'https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958311665&sdata=lCDzrPrhl0whSSU4NPpSOOHZ5rORWFVOrGCs0JdIHIY%3D&reserved=0' and Azure image: 'Openlogic CentOS 7.5 latest':
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: SKIPPED
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: PASSED
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC: ABORTED
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15: ABORTED
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY: PASSED
Test results for DPDK 'https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk.org%2Fdpdk-stable%2Fsnapshot%2Fdpdk-stable-18.11.2-rc1.tar.xz&data=02%7C01%7Cjuhlee%40microsoft.com%7Ccb20e6d3246248f7a01708d6e54da2cf%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948518958311665&sdata=lCDzrPrhl0whSSU4NPpSOOHZ5rORWFVOrGCs0JdIHIY%3D&reserved=0' and Azure image: 'SUSE SLES 15 latest':
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: FAILED
* VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: SKIPPED
* VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: PASSED
* VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-FAILSAFE-DURING-TRAFFIC: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-FWD-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS15: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-COMPLIANCE: PASSED
* VERIFY-DPDK-RING-LATENCY: PASSED
Thank you,
Jenkins DPDK
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 9:51 AM
To: dwilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; dev@dpdk.org; Sitong Liu <siliu@redhat.com>; Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>; qian.q.xu@intel.com; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>; David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; benjamin.walker@intel.com; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] 18.11.2 (LTS) patches review and test
On 24/05/2019 17:46, dwilder wrote:
> Hi Kevin-
>
> I tested 8.11.2 RC1 on IBM Power9 hardware. No issues or performance
> degradation were observed.
>
Thanks David. Good news on a Friday is always welcome :-)
> Tests run:
> * Single port stability test using l3fwd (16 cpus) and TRex, tested
> 64 and 1500 byte packets at a 0.0% drop rate for 4 hours each.
>
> System tested:
> - IBM Power9 Model 8335-101 CPU: 2.3 (pvr 004e 1203)
>
> Tested NICs:
> - ConnectX-5 (fw 16.23.1020).
>
> OS Tested
> - Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS (kernel 4.15.0-47-generic)
>
I will add it to the release notes,
thanks,
Kevin.
> Regards,
> Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-30 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 14:01 Kevin Traynor
2019-05-24 16:46 ` dwilder
2019-05-24 16:51 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-05-30 22:32 ` Ju-Hyoung Lee [this message]
2019-05-30 8:15 ` Ian Stokes
2019-05-30 11:59 ` Ali Alnubani
2019-06-04 8:11 ` Pei Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW2PR2101MB09863CF6A260C5F8F2F49139DA180@MW2PR2101MB0986.namprd21.prod.outlook.com \
--to=juhlee@microsoft.com \
--cc=Luca.Boccassi@microsoft.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=alialnu@mellanox.com \
--cc=benjamin.walker@intel.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
--cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
--cc=siliu@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=v-advlad@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).