From: Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>
To: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"ktraynor@redhat.com" <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 24.11 2/3] [PATCH 24.11] app/dma-perf: fix on-flight DMA when verifying data
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 10:53:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW4PR12MB748419C75BAC18383D717E98BFBCA@MW4PR12MB7484.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251125015130.12867-3-fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 November 2025 3:51
> To: stable@dpdk.org; ktraynor@redhat.com
> Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com
> Subject: [PATCH 24.11 2/3] [PATCH 24.11] app/dma-perf: fix on-flight DMA
> when verifying data
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> [ upstream commit d1b3b669674a17c58eabf3d631b21aaad7232403 ]
>
> There maybe on-flight DMA when verify_data() because the DMA device may
> still working when worker exit.
>
> This commit add wait DMA complete stage before worker exit.
>
> Fixes: 623dc9364dc6 ("app/dma-perf: introduce DMA performance test")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> ---
> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> index c08c5c8dc6..fc583725c4 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> #define MAX_DMA_CPL_NB 255
>
> #define TEST_WAIT_U_SECOND 10000
> -#define POLL_MAX 1000
>
> #define CSV_LINE_DMA_FMT "Scenario %u,%u,%s,%u,%u,%u,%u,%.2lf,%"
> PRIu64 ",%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
> #define CSV_LINE_CPU_FMT "Scenario %u,%u,NA,NA,NA,%u,%u,%.2lf,%"
> PRIu64 ",%.3lf,%.3lf\n"
> @@ -282,6 +281,40 @@ do_dma_submit_and_poll(uint16_t dev_id, uint64_t
> *async_cnt,
> worker_info->total_cpl += nr_cpl; }
>
> +static int
> +do_dma_submit_and_wait_cpl(uint16_t dev_id, uint64_t async_cnt) {
> +#define MAX_WAIT_MSEC 1000
> +#define MAX_POLL 1000
> +#define DEQ_SZ 64
> + enum rte_dma_vchan_status st;
> + uint32_t poll_cnt = 0;
> + uint32_t wait_ms = 0;
> + uint16_t nr_cpl;
> +
> + rte_dma_submit(dev_id, 0);
> +
> + if (rte_dma_vchan_status(dev_id, 0, &st) < 0) {
> + rte_delay_ms(MAX_WAIT_MSEC);
> + goto wait_cpl;
> + }
> +
> + while (st == RTE_DMA_VCHAN_ACTIVE && wait_ms++ <
> MAX_WAIT_MSEC) {
> + rte_delay_ms(1);
> + rte_dma_vchan_status(dev_id, 0, &st);
> + }
> +
> +wait_cpl:
> + while ((async_cnt > 0) && (poll_cnt++ < MAX_POLL)) {
> + nr_cpl = rte_dma_completed(dev_id, 0, MAX_DMA_CPL_NB, NULL,
> NULL);
> + async_cnt -= nr_cpl;
> + }
> + if (async_cnt > 0)
> + PRINT_ERR("Error: wait DMA %u failed!\n", dev_id);
> +
> + return async_cnt == 0 ? 0 : -1;
> +}
> +
> static inline int
> do_dma_plain_mem_copy(void *p)
> {
> @@ -293,10 +326,8 @@ do_dma_plain_mem_copy(void *p)
> const uint32_t buf_size = para->buf_size;
> struct rte_mbuf **srcs = para->srcs;
> struct rte_mbuf **dsts = para->dsts;
> - uint16_t nr_cpl;
> uint64_t async_cnt = 0;
> uint32_t i;
> - uint32_t poll_cnt = 0;
> int ret;
>
> worker_info->stop_flag = false;
> @@ -327,13 +358,7 @@ do_dma_plain_mem_copy(void *p)
> break;
> }
>
> - rte_dma_submit(dev_id, 0);
> - while ((async_cnt > 0) && (poll_cnt++ < POLL_MAX)) {
> - nr_cpl = rte_dma_completed(dev_id, 0, MAX_DMA_CPL_NB, NULL,
> NULL);
> - async_cnt -= nr_cpl;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + return do_dma_submit_and_wait_cpl(dev_id, async_cnt);
> }
>
> static inline int
> @@ -349,8 +374,6 @@ do_dma_sg_mem_copy(void *p)
> const uint16_t dev_id = para->dev_id;
> uint32_t nr_buf = para->nr_buf;
> uint64_t async_cnt = 0;
> - uint32_t poll_cnt = 0;
> - uint16_t nr_cpl;
> uint32_t i, j;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -386,13 +409,7 @@ do_dma_sg_mem_copy(void *p)
> break;
> }
>
> - rte_dma_submit(dev_id, 0);
> - while ((async_cnt > 0) && (poll_cnt++ < POLL_MAX)) {
> - nr_cpl = rte_dma_completed(dev_id, 0, MAX_DMA_CPL_NB, NULL,
> NULL);
> - async_cnt -= nr_cpl;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + return do_dma_submit_and_wait_cpl(dev_id, async_cnt);
> }
>
> static inline int
> --
> 2.17.1
Hey,
This patch has also been applied to 23.11.
Thanks,
Shani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-30 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 1:51 [PATCH 24.11 0/3] backport dmaperf bugfix Chengwen Feng
2025-11-25 1:51 ` [PATCH 24.11 1/3] [PATCH 24.11] vhost: fix compile error when without vduse.h Chengwen Feng
2025-11-25 10:30 ` Kevin Traynor
2025-11-26 0:39 ` fengchengwen
2025-11-25 1:51 ` [PATCH 24.11 2/3] [PATCH 24.11] app/dma-perf: fix on-flight DMA when verifying data Chengwen Feng
2025-12-30 10:53 ` Shani Peretz [this message]
2025-11-25 1:51 ` [PATCH 24.11 3/3] [PATCH 24.11] app/dma-perf: fix stopping device Chengwen Feng
2025-11-27 11:45 ` [PATCH 24.11 0/3] backport dmaperf bugfix Kevin Traynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=MW4PR12MB748419C75BAC18383D717E98BFBCA@MW4PR12MB7484.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=shperetz@nvidia.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).