From: "Rong, Leyi" <leyi.rong@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, AlvinX" <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Zhang, AlvinX" <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix offload flag checking in simple Tx datapath
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 03:27:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB2621D671ACA627B682F8D5F4EC549@SN6PR11MB2621.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427085859.22376-1-alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Alvin Zhang
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:59 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, AlvinX <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix offload flag checking in simple Tx
> datapath
>
> For Tx packets, if no other offload flag except 'PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6,
> PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4, PKT_TX_IPV6, PKT_TX_IPV4' is set, the hardware doesn't
> need to do offloads for these packets.
>
> This patch removes those previously indicated flags from the offload flag
> checking in simple Tx datapath.
>
> Fixes: 146ffa81d05e ("net/i40e: add Tx preparation for simple Tx datapath")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> 86a9eae..48d0582 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -1501,7 +1501,9 @@
> return i;
> }
>
> - if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) {
> + if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK &
> + ~(PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6 | PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 |
> + PKT_TX_IPV6 | PKT_TX_IPV4)) {
Hi Alvin,
Could we define a new macro like I40E_SIMPLE_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK as what I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK did.
That would have nice readability. Thanks!
> rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
> return i;
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 8:58 [dpdk-stable] " Alvin Zhang
2021-05-06 5:32 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Zhou, JunX W
2021-05-10 3:27 ` Rong, Leyi [this message]
2021-05-11 2:39 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Alvin Zhang
2021-05-11 8:08 ` Rong, Leyi
2021-05-11 8:45 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Alvin Zhang
2021-05-11 9:20 ` Rong, Leyi
2021-05-12 8:48 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB2621D671ACA627B682F8D5F4EC549@SN6PR11MB2621.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=leyi.rong@intel.com \
--cc=alvinx.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).