From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F7FA2EFC for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4122737B4; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr130041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.13.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4EA37B4; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:12:45 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SzsSf4R+T5Lo4tXt61OlFpBziODEkyOgcd0Q8EyRObMEOKLLJy2uEiQPBbh2tXHwYrteA4Qi5/Pao8O2/YFSE3wYvzxn38FlwuNJYfEOnnSukfPqjvNNCuzR2qGonXUo08qSRCIg8YbmiP4gIZc+m2oR8QJxK+pphDpDaHtr0hQ3Y+iziMXti/QP++6sllXRNkQrMbPlLMPzluNdbkK3qL7qMyz+5rkcg1kDalB9cXOSuX8h2D6p/Xsak229S3XUHEwslklehlp1dx3gnYlGRJT337znQ1Zz4bRG3P3ohP4GHwWbvm64wTAmwi9N202wtQlCbAhI+iXt6XfrJzWpyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WV+WnXHhr+EB0NReQAsDTWKUpqessuer5GG1aSjrxAc=; b=PHhzqvBo0r0JCnhPZJV1ertuDpWx8eAQG4JXseTQU6aJ1bbTE/mf+qcT3v4YJMDLjvNCfhZxd6ToTDgH1uk7mBRzYxOrYquIxyzpMAJgUn+6KSTdMO6jlHET9VCZiterGRK3G2yNQvtvguIXSMPkdgmNaBRF27v1bbFTFOUuYKDuNuCkOQd/dUpON2kTa1An7rkpw5NVc+in532dTVTEvMjhAddqofwsxHslMJA4zWa8gBsLSk1TKZmvtCAu1a4Z9q9glog/er8Io8vrzJ66oPubOZctHF+5cCSSgZjTZAaHc8ip3fGBHe+odS6kM2wlXCchM6UhVpeuAbnRXqRs4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nxp.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nxp.com; dkim=pass header.d=nxp.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=WV+WnXHhr+EB0NReQAsDTWKUpqessuer5GG1aSjrxAc=; b=Si5sKDSY39Ky2LQJmFi+yoEvmZTiM+GmSUO6G7sUcg+egWXgeojv4Bt8PSrLxNSOhDfMUKBP58M/Zj9Z3cALIOykCC6xIxgu4rIjZe63aXBbAd7W02BtPitBnFbZbqDvpX+ScMV6jqN65Y7X6wxwSQ8AgvDJdHSrCiAQGhiNNzA= Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.255.118.11) by VE1PR04MB6511.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.179.233.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:12:44 +0000 Received: from VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c045:5df2:ba1f:c3ee]) by VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c045:5df2:ba1f:c3ee%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:12:44 +0000 From: Akhil Goyal To: "asomalap@amd.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v1 6/6] crypto/ccp: scheduling multiple CCP within single burst Thread-Index: AQHVgyaTV1GS07M7VUSBm8yNMjhUFadbi7+Q Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:12:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20191015070239.93608-1-asomalap@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20191015070239.93608-1-asomalap@amd.com> Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=akhil.goyal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [92.120.1.65] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 82014db5-510c-4d93-66e3-08d751609a36 x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1PR04MB6511: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790; x-forefront-prvs: 01917B1794 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(110136005)(25786009)(316002)(2501003)(7696005)(76176011)(66066001)(55016002)(9686003)(99286004)(6246003)(81156014)(86362001)(6506007)(229853002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(8936002)(8676002)(81166006)(102836004)(26005)(6436002)(186003)(476003)(3846002)(256004)(6116002)(2906002)(4744005)(44832011)(66446008)(5660300002)(66556008)(52536014)(76116006)(66946007)(64756008)(486006)(7736002)(305945005)(14454004)(66476007)(74316002)(4326008)(33656002)(446003)(11346002)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VE1PR04MB6511; H:VE1PR04MB6639.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: zam4d1PUmJjYEqNehdSy0ccikpvMJ7nhQFAzND+SIrwcPlm8fT+GFqsLoX0MD/TROmhhdVTbc5zFJBdkzXQCVsLMOmuI4wwQkT+ppxCRn+tE138UWYm7ZvzW3mtSsj1PCx6s1UX70D/0YyCjWGOKqm7YbQMq6tUjyJZ8DQbdO8dRxL58V1VMmLttuzCG+PQovdhQFRMn4yluKi3cXfuAajkySC9v7PDCRiuftVXRZamBRZS0EcyR4kLTwVieTV/JzPqFltKBmVZEC62zOvHQ1WPMRALtsrVCvzyBeWXx89ggwdIYPgUmJKYSAB8ZJoN1YgushbjURjLrkQJ5KTYn3zbRrbZCIjQO8U9FPRySTUaCmGqj2FH/bHEiGQWPEVma9C0bf3Dz/esWfzvDRE+D8k2SFaWiw8GLZNa0w94jmqM= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 82014db5-510c-4d93-66e3-08d751609a36 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Oct 2019 11:12:44.1022 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: NSD/RAkE9wvPBUkVK7J/+jWgMtQLFXjmdvLRjjEWJjhaFrc1f5gjUn75czra0CgWp/JrAdUlqKdhOi10SooQNw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1PR04MB6511 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1 6/6] crypto/ccp: scheduling multiple CCP within single burst X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Title: crypto/ccp: schedule multiple devs within single burst Or=20 Crypto/ccp: improve performance. >=20 > From: Amaranath Somalapuram >=20 > ccp driver was scheduling only one CCP in a single burst. > Effective throughput was limited to 1 CCP performance. > Scheduling multiple ccp within one burst will increase the ccp performanc= e. > this changes will divide the enqueue packets equally among the multiple C= CP > Cc: stable@dpdk.org This patch also doesn't look like a fix, rather a performance improvement. Not sure if this need to be backported? If yes, then a fixes line is required and title would be "crypto/ccp: fix p= erformance" >=20 > Signed-off-by: Amaranath Somalapuram > ---