From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F1341FDD for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F64027B; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164BE40279 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:18:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1693484280; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aNDDtQUK7SuZM63dg25FI3J6D40l26Re0/R8m0xqrVc=; b=geomKyxOwu491aqdoNblUsh2Zfiecy5wFT/KkRydjGMVl27f+3xiY9jau6DwyYI7v+jowV 4tSw9ijbxi1+6zg7pocJoCJnGtic41FZvqQYjUeWGQfAHB4Yt/+LOyd0UzhN2suQED8dWU nTShDmWUsKKQNE9NhT1UJe9cMqqkAf8= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-587-ufPuoougOOOUlslDsFWf2A-1; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 08:17:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ufPuoougOOOUlslDsFWf2A-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-401bdff6bc5so4854525e9.1 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693484278; x=1694089078; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:references:cc:to:from :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aNDDtQUK7SuZM63dg25FI3J6D40l26Re0/R8m0xqrVc=; b=H73kFUbSVyqZBSezr9ZzAtox5PGX0A9UyctZx9xNM8GNYc4eJDlo8ca0EqJu7DrTrb H+Ommx3TgHvIgekgfmdmhjy4/KSm/MiZcg+G1QrlnToXMsFDHuK3k85h1s5utC6NepPg uPo9gvu6FlCn/SQlIF6z3LXcMmFshJyUk+XfHCuKlPh//DDiyh0kRtCQ9ev9xJd9MmXV mRjXtdgC7yzu6d5/clfEVM1X7yOPwrfVD6++G5hHiJ/gh8zYB6o6fFLD3w51xty1U7KG 9jhwaFbaxWIjfaVoWGh+cwebU4eR7CnUf9PtyC910qvqqrICqw62aM9GfHKHi8TKdudp CtlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YycX75/Ma8BvpzFelX4n9EHLcWxZMkO3mdDFffly+Q6kce7TlSD sL8B0gzEVXJgVXCIhHgfsa47fDmcPXX38h4THWG8/Vy+0wlNVMOsfT9Nocl2cXI2Me8H8WbkZGF Ks4NNvG8= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3c1:0:b0:3fc:e1:24b5 with SMTP id t1-20020a7bc3c1000000b003fc00e124b5mr3582122wmj.23.1693484278007; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErPsJtOnCp9C8vwde3r/N8WToprogQ0GxKtKXE5YKhX4PruQNT1VZdpfC1mSfhtRrBj12DhA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3c1:0:b0:3fc:e1:24b5 with SMTP id t1-20020a7bc3c1000000b003fc00e124b5mr3582101wmj.23.1693484277499; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 05:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.36] ([78.16.128.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n17-20020a7bcbd1000000b003fee777fd84sm1788766wmi.41.2023.08.31.05.17.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Aug 2023 05:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:17:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 From: Kevin Traynor To: "Xu, HailinX" , Xueming Li , "stable@dpdk.org" , Jingjing Wu , Beilei Xing , ke1.xu@intel.com, zhichaox.zeng@intel.com, "Zhang, Qi Z" Cc: "xuemingl@nvdia.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Stokes, Ian" , "Mcnamara, John" , Luca Boccassi , "Xu, Qian Q" , Thomas Monjalon , "Peng, Yuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" References: <20230817061332.16248-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> Subject: Re: 22.11.3 patches review and test In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org On 30/08/2023 17:25, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 29/08/2023 09:22, Xu, HailinX wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Xueming Li >>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 2:14 PM >>> To: stable@dpdk.org >>> Cc: xuemingl@nvdia.com; dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe >>> ; Ali Alnubani ; >>> Walker, Benjamin ; David Christensen >>> ; Hemant Agrawal ; >>> Stokes, Ian ; Jerin Jacob ; >>> Mcnamara, John ; Ju-Hyoung Lee >>> ; Kevin Traynor ; Luca Boccassi >>> ; Pei Zhang ; Xu, Qian Q >>> ; Raslan Darawsheh ; Thomas >>> Monjalon ; Yanghang Liu ; >>> Peng, Yuan ; Chen, Zhaoyan >>> Subject: 22.11.3 patches review and test >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 22.11.3. >>> >>> The planned date for the final release is 31th August. >>> >>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any >>> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and >>> reported validations will be added to the release notes. >>> >>> A release candidate tarball can be found at: >>> >>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v22.11.3-rc1 >>> >>> These patches are located at branch 22.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >>> https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> We are conducting DPDK testing and have found two issues. >> >> 1. The startup speed of testpmd is significantly slower in the os of SUSE >> This issue fix patch has been merged into main, But it has not backported to 22.11.3. >> Fix patch commit id on DPDK main: 7e7b6762eac292e78c77ad37ec0973c0c944b845 >> >> 2. The SCTP tunnel packet of iavf cannot be forwarded in avx512 mode Need to clarify this sentence. It looks like it is not a functional bug where avx512 mode is selected and then an SCTP tunnel packet cannot be sent. Instead, it is a possible performance issue that avx512 mode will not be selected where it might have been due to unneeded additions (RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_*_TNL_TSO) to IAVF_TX_NO_VECTOR_FLAGS. @IAVF maintainers - please confirm my analysis is correct ? In that case, as it is a possible performance issue in a specific case for a single driver I think it is non-critical for 21.11 and we can just revert the patch on the branch and wait for 21.11.6 release in December. thanks, Kevin. >> commit 9b7215f150d0bfc5cb00fce68ff08e5217c7f2b3 on v22.11.3-rc1. >> This commit is for the new feature (avx512 checksum offload) in DPDK 23.03, which should not be backported to the LTS version since avx512 checksum offload is not supported in v22.11.3 LTS. >> > > Thanks for flagging Xueming. > > The issue is that it was listed as fixing 059f18ae2aec ("net/iavf: add > offload path for Tx AVX512") which goes back to 21.05. > > This could have been avoided if the 'Fixes:' tag was correct, or if the > authors replied to the email about queued backports :/ > > Requesting iavf/next-net-intel maintainers to check Fixes: tags are > correct before merging. > > DPDK 21.11.5 is already released with this patch. Any idea why it did > not show up in validation for 21.11.5 ? Is it an issue for 21.11.5 ? How > critical is it ? > > I can revert it on the 21.11 branch, but it will need to wait until > 21.11.6 in December before it will be reverted in a released version. > > thanks, > Kevin. > >> Regards, >> Xu, Hailin >> >