From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: move debug_autotest out of fast suite
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:02:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8174f758357d7230d8c19e5086c2a9fe2fedb2c.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x2c=Trh7gXsVnBv6niLy3VdZrtqgmFBUh-b=dyM1x6QA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 15:19 +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:13 PM Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> wrote:
> > RTE>>EAL: Detected 2 lcore(s)
> > EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes
> > EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/debug_autotest/mp_socket
> > EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA'
> > EAL: Probing VFIO support...
> > APP: HPET is not enabled, using TSC as default timer
> > RTE>>debug_autotest
> > 10: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61c6a) [0x5562b61f7c6a]]
> > 9: [/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xea) [0x7f9793188d0a]]
> > 8: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x386ae) [0x5562b61ce6ae]]
> > 7: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_in+0x71) [0x7f9793925841]]
> > 6: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(rdline_char_in+0x36b) [0x7f9793928abb]]
> > 5: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(+0x3770) [0x7f9793925770]]
> > 4: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_parse+0x1af) [0x7f979392664f]]
> > 3: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61d5b) [0x5562b61f7d5b]]
> > 2: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0xc2c13) [0x5562b6258c13]]
> > 1: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_eal.so.21(rte_dump_stack+0x2e) [0x7f9793a931be]]
> > PANIC in test_panic():
> > Test Debug
> > 11: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61c6a) [0x5562b61f7c6a]]
> > 10: [/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xea) [0x7f9793188d0a]]
> > 9: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x386ae) [0x5562b61ce6ae]]
> > 8: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_in+0x71) [0x7f9793925841]]
> > 7: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(rdline_char_in+0x36b) [0x7f9793928abb]]
> > 6: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(+0x3770) [0x7f9793925770]]
> > 5: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_cmdline.so.21(cmdline_parse+0x1af) [0x7f979392664f]]
> > 4: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x61d5b) [0x5562b61f7d5b]]
> > 3: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/dpdk-test(+0x3d671) [0x5562b61d3671]]
> > 2: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_eal.so.21(__rte_panic+0xc1) [0x7f9793a7187f]]
> > 1: [/tmp/reprotest.YBma9j/build-experiment-1/build-experiment-1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/app/test/../../lib/librte_eal.so.21(rte_dump_stack+0x2e) [0x7f9793a931be]]
> > <...>
> > debug_autotest time out (After 30.0 seconds)
>
> Ah a timeout.
> Could it be that coredumps (of the children processes here) are being captured?
>
> Can you test with this patch:
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210125150539.27537-1-david.marchand@redhat.com/
> ?
> It disables coredump generation in the autotests when failure is expected.
That works, thank you!
Please mark it for backporting, so I can include it in 20.11
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-02 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 19:48 [dpdk-stable] " luca.boccassi
2021-03-01 8:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2021-03-02 14:13 ` Luca Boccassi
2021-03-02 14:19 ` David Marchand
2021-03-02 16:02 ` Luca Boccassi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8174f758357d7230d8c19e5086c2a9fe2fedb2c.camel@debian.org \
--to=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).