From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38F8A034F for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:55:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63EA40040; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:55:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f205.google.com (mail-pg1-f205.google.com [209.85.215.205]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAE54003F for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 05:57:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f205.google.com with SMTP id 2so23754671pgo.0 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:57:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=docs.google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:date:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ujC2H61h97d/tCyRb6wE0B9p8vgNp4BZTd/Mht+prZY=; b=Jhsz7Yexr28gYFu41zBQtj/CsMvEHUBASbG3mMbhSr9JdIGQBbIcik3/RCnR271pob U25gpeebxe8geeNper7ty5qLN2I4R6sevoZZSC97zbReRzCStEFEhEOO+7d7VnOEjaSm MCRuro9CnG4C9CIpB9l1Yeib5F2wi+ZBQ4zmWFda8yqlW5y7jMKKsrvKxo0X/u3QkTxZ y5OMIMzaPwq55oZ7MYsPk3umVda/BtEu59vIrc5/L2JT8xNsag76sVB7azTKyP+sb/2U 1qeLPr2cy+cmAdOrUpWr2bWXITYS5Dc2d+MKajjmUDAV6TT/RJciayptUuG2+128R7qy ozoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:from:to; bh=ujC2H61h97d/tCyRb6wE0B9p8vgNp4BZTd/Mht+prZY=; b=fNNy6501TM3I1fgPLXrt7k1LY/5ds7nt+G/w3DEMaTIMUrz+6crnFu4ze2ziOszBjS i7dxlJDPQMq70wiSKLEj15uci8QucbZTa0I6KziSk5JQOvhM5vgOqpE2lBu780jM1EpH 7W5Y60suvZrseWMslxIMDFitxA7ukhrCFoOphy91z8Ak+qH+rXnDMbybG/uiUVpo7QjJ ZIIX3nyHVtTBEwP1m/UwvRK6kgM3/ZxjMwlKCCgtR7GHETgyUIsd2biFNt50SPI/VPpn LYwCo6vKw2e230yKBB4Os7xwwkKCHb8FYIh2G6QTixTKVICLzjmUczOLJJQ7HB2+FDkT 7Idw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531c8Xdkrg+l9fvIpLj1uX+fI6Ni+gAjS7g68U/YZ7+Lq1CMxjeU 4Jinh1Vp6g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqTEsu/ycZtyOWOKheM1BfvR3pbU5T2fj3cMzOjJKKisPggmhlCtWNZzbyrJJ693wnsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a63:1026:: with SMTP id f38mr10184648pgl.142.1616129858730; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:57:38 -0700 X-Document-ID: AAHRpnXs5Rw0gwYNouaoXIvLqpfoxwXPoXeZWvGL-AckBuWIeQIq0h7MgkUErhlK56jCiwxF90pux23IWEFEzCE6YNulDfJUHz0hFypBkEtNa__UwGN5bi7w References: X-No-Auto-Attachment: 1 X-Doco-ID: AAAALzc_dBA X-Notifications: 76fad9b895200000 Message-ID: From: "Somnath Kotur (Google Slides)" To: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:55:40 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-stable] DPDK Development Process X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: No Reply Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Somnath Kotur mentioned you in a comment in the following document DPDK Development Process (https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1OZKDRfPocVw-918PF2_5IeTH8FOZ8xya_JaJg5a5z4g/edit?disco=AAAALzc_dBA&ts=60542f42&usp=comment_email_document&usp_dm=false) You do not have commenting rights to DPDK Development Process. [1 comment hidden] Somnath Kotur Here are my thoughts @andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com , @ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com , @lance.richardson@broadcom.com ,@kalesh When we upstream one of our individual patches , we are already making a judgement call if a patch needs to go in one of the n-1,n-2 LTS releases by marking it for stable( or not) using the ' Cc: @stable@dpdk.org' tag correct? So maybe when we do that we can automatically cherrypick the patch to the 2 LTS branches for 17.11 and 19.11? (90 % of the time patches should apply cleanly using the 'cherry-pick' button on Gerrit itself, since the code in those 2 branches was based on int_nxt anyway). Now, it should be Randy's team's call if the patch from these LTS branches needs to be also included in the corresponding release branch that has been cut from these LTS branches , IOW, the gatekeeper for these 'release branches' is from their team, make sense? So if/when there is a bug on any of these release branches , Randy's team will look at the patches that went into these LTS branches and see cherrypicking any of them to the release branch would help in the fix? Does this make sense? Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA You have received this email because you are mentioned in this thread. Change () what Google sends you. You cannot reply to this email.