From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94BFA0471
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC73F1C46F;
	Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:35:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017)
 id A96DB1D0B5; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:35:19 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <77307b1fb7ec974c6dc00a8e94e576b9e259ea63.1560958308.git.xuanziyang2@huawei.com>
References: <77307b1fb7ec974c6dc00a8e94e576b9e259ea63.1560958308.git.xuanziyang2@huawei.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: Ziyang Xuan <xuanziyang2@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20190619153519.A96DB1D0B5@dpdk.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:35:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw54997 [PATCH v5 01/15]
	net/hinic/base: add HW registers definition
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/54997

_coding style issues_


CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'q_id' - possible side-effects?
#111: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:79:
+#define HINIC_EQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num)	\
+		((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \
+		HINIC_AEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \
+		HINIC_CEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num)))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pg_num' - possible side-effects?
#111: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:79:
+#define HINIC_EQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num)	\
+		((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \
+		HINIC_AEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \
+		HINIC_CEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num)))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'q_id' - possible side-effects?
#116: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:84:
+#define HINIC_EQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num)	\
+		((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \
+		HINIC_AEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \
+		HINIC_CEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num)))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pg_num' - possible side-effects?
#116: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:84:
+#define HINIC_EQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num)	\
+		((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \
+		HINIC_AEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \
+		HINIC_CEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num)))

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 160 lines checked