From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E47A046B for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:00:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D101E2F; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:00:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 8558A2B82; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:00:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: References: To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Ziyang Xuan Message-Id: <20190627080028.8558A2B82@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:00:28 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw55439 [PATCH v6 01/15] net/hinic/base: add HW registers definition X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/55439 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'q_id' - possible side-effects? #111: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:79: +#define HINIC_EQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num) \ + ((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \ + HINIC_AEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \ + HINIC_CEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num))) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pg_num' - possible side-effects? #111: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:79: +#define HINIC_EQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num) \ + ((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \ + HINIC_AEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \ + HINIC_CEQ_HI_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num))) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'q_id' - possible side-effects? #116: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:84: +#define HINIC_EQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num) \ + ((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \ + HINIC_AEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \ + HINIC_CEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num))) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pg_num' - possible side-effects? #116: FILE: drivers/net/hinic/base/hinic_csr.h:84: +#define HINIC_EQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(type, q_id, pg_num) \ + ((u32)((type == HINIC_AEQ) ? \ + HINIC_AEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num) : \ + HINIC_CEQ_LO_PHYS_ADDR_REG(q_id, pg_num))) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 160 lines checked