From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389EAA0471 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B1A1BDF5; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id E196A1BE2A; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:51:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20190717184945.4025-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20190717184945.4025-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20190717185108.E196A1BE2A@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:51:08 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw56657 [RFC] net: be more restrictive in ether_unformat_addr X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/56657 _coding style issues_ WARNING:UNNECESSARY_ELSE: else is not generally useful after a break or return #154: FILE: lib/librte_net/rte_ether.c:107: + return 0; + else { total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 126 lines checked