From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF3CA3206 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 02:24:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1B61252; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 02:24:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id BA7481252; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 02:24:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20191021002300.26497-5-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> References: <20191021002300.26497-5-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli Message-Id: <20191021002449.BA7481252@dpdk.org> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 02:24:49 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw61492 [RFC v6 4/6] test/ring: add perf tests for configurable element size ring X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/61492 _coding style issues_ WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #96: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:34: +static const volatile unsigned bulk_sizes[] = { 8, 32 }; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #99: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:37: + unsigned c1, c2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #102: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:40: +static volatile unsigned lcore_count; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #109: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:47: + unsigned id1, id2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #110: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:48: + unsigned c1, c2, s1, s2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #137: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:75: + unsigned id1, id2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #138: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:76: + unsigned c1, c2, s1, s2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #161: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:99: + unsigned id1, id2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #162: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:100: + unsigned s1, s2; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #183: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:121: + const unsigned iter_shift = 26; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #184: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:122: + const unsigned iterations = 1<size; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #226: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:164: + unsigned i; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #263: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:201: + const unsigned iter_shift = 23; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #264: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:202: + const unsigned iterations = 1<size; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #268: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:206: + unsigned i; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #307: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:245: + unsigned i; WARNING:ARRAY_SIZE: Prefer ARRAY_SIZE(bulk_sizes) #308: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:246: + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(bulk_sizes)/sizeof(bulk_sizes[0]); i++) { WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #336: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:274: + const unsigned iter_shift = 24; WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #337: FILE: app/test/test_ring_perf_elem.c:275: + const unsigned iterations = 1<