From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66BAA04B6 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:38:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEF61BEFD; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:38:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id BE0F71BF4F; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:38:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20191113082945.21277-3-somnath.kotur@broadcom.com> References: <20191113082945.21277-3-somnath.kotur@broadcom.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Somnath Kotur Message-Id: <20191113083827.BE0F71BF4F@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:38:27 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw62949 [PATCH 2/6] net/bnxt: fix to cap queue count for NS3/Stingray devices X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/62949 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'bp' - possible side-effects? #76: FILE: drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:612: +#define BNXT_MAX_RINGS(bp) \ + (BNXT_STINGRAY(bp) ? RTE_MIN(RTE_MIN(bp->max_rx_rings, \ + MAX_STINGRAY_RINGS), \ + bp->max_stat_ctx) : \ + RTE_MIN(bp->max_rx_rings, bp->max_stat_ctx)) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 37 lines checked