From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A62A04DD for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 02:35:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80091D514; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 02:35:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 505AD1D594; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 02:35:45 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20200104013341.19809-13-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200104013341.19809-13-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20200104013545.505AD1D594@dpdk.org> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 02:35:45 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw64209 [PATCH 12/14] ethdev: raise priority of old driver warning X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/64209 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'surpressed' may be misspelled - perhaps 'suppressed'? #80: behaviour on close was debug. And debug messages are typically surpressed total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked