From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEB7A0352
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:02:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1607E1C066;
	Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:02:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017)
 id 188211C1B6; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:02:19 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <20200116163836.15696-1-taox.zhu@intel.com>
References: <20200116163836.15696-1-taox.zhu@intel.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: taox.zhu@intel.com
Message-Id: <20200116080219.188211C1B6@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:02:19 +0100 (CET)
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw64756 [PATCH] net/ice: fix flow
	fdir/switch memory leak.
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/64756

_coding style issues_


CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pos' - possible side-effects?
#82: FILE: drivers/net/ice/base/ice_osdep.h:346:
+#define LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(pos, tmp, head, type, member)		       \
+	for ((pos) = (head)->lh_first ?					       \
+		     container_of((head)->lh_first, struct type, member) :     \
+		     0,                                                        \
+		     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((pos)->member.next.le_next ?    \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0);						       \
+	     (pos);							       \
+	     (pos) = (tmp),						       \
+	     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((tmp)->member.next.le_next ?	       \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'tmp' - possible side-effects?
#82: FILE: drivers/net/ice/base/ice_osdep.h:346:
+#define LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(pos, tmp, head, type, member)		       \
+	for ((pos) = (head)->lh_first ?					       \
+		     container_of((head)->lh_first, struct type, member) :     \
+		     0,                                                        \
+		     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((pos)->member.next.le_next ?    \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0);						       \
+	     (pos);							       \
+	     (pos) = (tmp),						       \
+	     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((tmp)->member.next.le_next ?	       \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'head' - possible side-effects?
#82: FILE: drivers/net/ice/base/ice_osdep.h:346:
+#define LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(pos, tmp, head, type, member)		       \
+	for ((pos) = (head)->lh_first ?					       \
+		     container_of((head)->lh_first, struct type, member) :     \
+		     0,                                                        \
+		     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((pos)->member.next.le_next ?    \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0);						       \
+	     (pos);							       \
+	     (pos) = (tmp),						       \
+	     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((tmp)->member.next.le_next ?	       \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0))

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'member' - possible side-effects?
#82: FILE: drivers/net/ice/base/ice_osdep.h:346:
+#define LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(pos, tmp, head, type, member)		       \
+	for ((pos) = (head)->lh_first ?					       \
+		     container_of((head)->lh_first, struct type, member) :     \
+		     0,                                                        \
+		     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((pos)->member.next.le_next ?    \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0);						       \
+	     (pos);							       \
+	     (pos) = (tmp),						       \
+	     (tmp) = (pos) == 0 ? 0 : ((tmp)->member.next.le_next ?	       \
+		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,     \
+				  member) :				       \
+		     0))

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 95 lines checked