From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1A7A0573 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:23:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F5B1BFBC; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:23:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 4D8261BFBC; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:23:38 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1583346152-10186-6-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> References: <1583346152-10186-6-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Nicolas Chautru Message-Id: <20200304182338.4D8261BFBC@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:23:38 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw66253 [PATCH v2 05/15] test-bbdev: rename FPGA LTE macros to be more explicit X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/66253 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'explict' may be misspelled - perhaps 'explicit'? #59: so that to be more explict for future extension. total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 99 lines checked