automatic DPDK test reports
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw67268 [PATCH v2 3/7] net/virtio: add vectorized packed ring Rx function
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:19:34 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327091934.020B21C0CB@dpdk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327165412.87359-4-yong.liu@intel.com>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/67268

_coding style issues_


CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '*' (ctx:WxV)
#162: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c:2332:
+virtio_recv_pkts_packed_vec(void __rte_unused *rx_queue,
                                               ^

CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '*' (ctx:WxO)
#163: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c:2333:
+			    struct rte_mbuf __rte_unused **rx_pkts,
 			                                 ^

CHECK:CAMELCASE: Avoid CamelCase: <_Pragma>
#198: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:25:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") \

ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#198: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:25:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'iter' - possible side-effects?
#198: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:25:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'size' may be better as '(size)' to avoid precedence issues
#198: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:25:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("GCC unroll 4") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#203: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:30:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("unroll 4") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'iter' - possible side-effects?
#203: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:30:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("unroll 4") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'size' may be better as '(size)' to avoid precedence issues
#203: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:30:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("unroll 4") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#208: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:35:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("unroll (4)") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'iter' - possible side-effects?
#208: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:35:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("unroll (4)") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'size' may be better as '(size)' to avoid precedence issues
#208: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:35:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, size) _Pragma("unroll (4)") \
+	for (iter = val; iter < size; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'iter' - possible side-effects?
#213: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:40:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, num) \
+	for (iter = val; iter < num; iter++)

CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'num' may be better as '(num)' to avoid precedence issues
#213: FILE: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_avx.c:40:
+#define virtio_for_each_try_unroll(iter, val, num) \
+	for (iter = val; iter < num; iter++)

total: 3 errors, 0 warnings, 11 checks, 455 lines checked

           reply	other threads:[~2020-03-27  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20200327165412.87359-4-yong.liu@intel.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200327091934.020B21C0CB@dpdk.org \
    --to=checkpatch@dpdk.org \
    --cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).