From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C821A057B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557D21BDAC; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 9645D1BEA6; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200401083532.13658-1-apeksha.gupta@nxp.com> References: <20200401083532.13658-1-apeksha.gupta@nxp.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Apeksha Gupta Message-Id: <20200401083756.9645D1BEA6@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:37:56 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw67569 [PATCH] config: update MAX_FRAG to support jumbo packets X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/67569 _coding style issues_ WARNING:UNKNOWN_COMMIT_ID: Unknown commit id '9788b93b9d5', maybe rebased or not pulled? #57: Fixes: 9788b93b9d5 ("config: MAX_FRAG updated to support the jumbo total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 16 lines checked