From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004F7A034E for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 21:39:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73821DAA0; Wed, 6 May 2020 21:39:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 656771DA54; Wed, 6 May 2020 21:39:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200506193741.24117-8-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200506193741.24117-8-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20200506193956.656771DA54@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 21:39:56 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw69870 [PATCH 7/7] app/proc-info: provide way to request info on owned ports X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/69870 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'explictly' may be misspelled - perhaps 'explicitly'? #83: ports. This patch provides way for the user to explictly ask for these total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 127 lines checked