From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E2AA0353 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:20:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B8937B4; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:20:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 1FB1B1C0D5; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:20:43 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200806171947.6609-6-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200806171947.6609-6-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20200806172043.1FB1B1C0D5@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 19:20:43 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw75261 [PATCH v3 20.08 5/6] rte_ethdev: change comment to rte_dev_eth_mac_addr_add X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/75261 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #82: The comment used the term whitelist and was awkardly written. total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 9 lines checked