From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83096A04B4 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 09:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7951B1C0AE; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 09:45:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 0402B1C0AF; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 09:45:51 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <238443d2-512d-185d-945e-6c77815f7888@huawei.com> References: <238443d2-512d-185d-945e-6c77815f7888@huawei.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: liqingqing Message-Id: <20200808074551.0402B1C0AF@dpdk.org> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 09:45:51 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw75319 [PATCH v2] net/hinic: fix secondary process's using coredump. X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/75319 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'process'' may be misspelled - perhaps 'process's'? #40: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/hinic: fix secondary process's using total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 33 lines checked