From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324BAA04C7 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:22:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524661C1A6; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:22:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id B50791C115; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:22:45 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200915151114.12024-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200915151114.12024-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20200915152245.B50791C115@dpdk.org> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:22:45 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw77754 [PATCH v3 01/17] doc/coding_style: add policy about master/slave X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/77754 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #82: introducing new master/slave usage. This is taken from the similar WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #82: introducing new master/slave usage. This is taken from the similar WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #103: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #103: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #103: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #103: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #103: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #104: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:291: +whitelist' is not allowed. WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #106: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:293: +Recommended replacements for 'master / slave' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #106: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:293: +Recommended replacements for 'master / slave' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #113: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:300: +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #113: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:300: +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'compatiablity' may be misspelled - perhaps 'compatibility'? #117: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:304: +Exceptions for introducing new usage is to maintain compatiablity total: 0 errors, 13 warnings, 29 lines checked