From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA78A04B6 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:32:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE8D1D54C; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:31:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 7738E1D523; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:31:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200917053035.1889989-7-mk@semihalf.com> References: <20200917053035.1889989-7-mk@semihalf.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Michal Krawczyk Message-Id: <20200917053158.7738E1D523@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:31:58 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw77966 [PATCH 06/20] net/ena/base: remove MMIOWB_NOT_DEFINED ifdef X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/77966 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'replacment' may be misspelled - perhaps 'replacement'? #80: As there is no replacment for mmiowb() and there is no need to use both total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 9 lines checked