From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060BBA04BC for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 06:11:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3191D6BB; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 06:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 3CE051D6B7; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 06:11:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20201010040520.63049-5-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> References: <20201010040520.63049-5-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Ajit Khaparde Message-Id: <20201010041108.3CE051D6B7@dpdk.org> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 06:11:08 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw80249 [PATCH v2 04/12] net/bnxt: fix PMD PF support in SR-IOV mode X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/80249 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'forwared' may be misspelled - perhaps 'forwarded'? #95: 8. Update the HWRM commands list that can be forwared to the CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'cmd' - possible side-effects? #120: FILE: drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:170: +#define BNXT_HWRM_CMD_TO_FORWARD(cmd) \ + (bp->pf->vf_req_fwd[(cmd) / 32] |= (1 << ((cmd) % 32))) total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks, 760 lines checked