From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884A7A04B7
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:56:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAD11DBE3;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017)
 id 59FDC1DBDD; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:55:57 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1602596753-32282-32-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>
References: <1602596753-32282-32-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Message-Id: <20201013135557.59FDC1DBDD@dpdk.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:55:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw80533 [PATCH 31/36] net/sfc: support
	per-queue Rx prefix for EF100
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/80533

_coding style issues_


WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOTSUP)
#184: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:732:
+		return ENOTSUP;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOTSUP)
#193: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef100_rx.c:741:
+		return ENOTSUP;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOTSUP)
#253: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c:664:
+		return ENOTSUP;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOTSUP)
#257: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_essb_rx.c:668:
+		return ENOTSUP;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'accesssors' may be misspelled - perhaps 'accessors'?
#271: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c:227:
+ * Below Rx pseudo-header (aka Rx prefix) accesssors rely on the

ERROR:OPEN_BRACE: that open brace { should be on the previous line
#277: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c:233:
+		[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_RSS_HASH]	=
+		    { 0, sizeof(uint32_t) * CHAR_BIT, B_FALSE },

ERROR:OPEN_BRACE: that open brace { should be on the previous line
#279: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c:235:
+		[EFX_RX_PREFIX_FIELD_LENGTH]	=
+		    { 8 * CHAR_BIT, sizeof(uint16_t) * CHAR_BIT, B_FALSE },

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOTSUP)
#301: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c:726:
+		return ENOTSUP;

WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -ENOTSUP)
#329: FILE: drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c:545:
+		return ENOTSUP;

total: 2 errors, 7 warnings, 0 checks, 221 lines checked