From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D60A04B7 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:29:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7A91DEB6; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 832D61DDFA; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:29:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20201014152756.6518-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20201014152756.6518-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20201014152941.832D61DDFA@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:29:41 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw80757 [PATCH v6 01/18] doc/coding_style: add policy about master/slave X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/80757 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #81: introducing new master/slave usage. This is taken from the similar WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #81: introducing new master/slave usage. This is taken from the similar WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #102: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #102: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #102: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #102: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #102: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:290: +'master / slave' (or 'slave' independent of 'master') and 'blacklist / WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #103: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:291: +whitelist' is not allowed. WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'master' may be misspelled - perhaps 'primary'? #105: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:293: +Recommended replacements for 'master / slave' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'slave' may be misspelled - perhaps 'secondary'? #105: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:293: +Recommended replacements for 'master / slave' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #112: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:300: +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #112: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:300: +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'compatability' may be misspelled - perhaps 'compatibility'? #116: FILE: doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst:304: +Exceptions for introducing new usage is to maintain compatability total: 0 errors, 13 warnings, 29 lines checked